GNU bug report logs -
#51893
thoughts about keys
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 51893 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#51893
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
Andreas Diener <Andreas-Diener <at> web.de>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Tue, 16 Nov 2021 14:28:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/html, inline)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#51893
; Package
emacs
.
(Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:15:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 51893 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
package emacs
merge 51893 5206
thankyou
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:55:19AM +0100, Andreas Diener wrote:
> Dear Madam or Sir,
>
> first: I am from Germany and not a foreign language correspondence clerk, so please excuse my "not so nice" english. I
> hope you will understand my text (and my issue).
> I saw your email-adress on the gnu-emacs-site and I thought, you may be interested in a comment from a kind of frustrated
> "almost-Emacs-user".
>
> My setting: as mentioned I am from Germany so I work with german keyboard-layout (on Mac), Emacs is 27.2. I am not a
> software engineer and I don't write programm code but "prosa" and at times I use LaTeX. To make notes I like to work with
> a "slim" editor and simple txt-files with which I can work later on.
> Looking around I recently stumbled over Vim and Emacs and I am impressed how powerful these programs are. And perhaps for
> me it is not really necessary to work with such advanced programms, I think it is beneficial to know them (and
> additional: very interesting and although not so easy to handle I think that's part of the fun).
>
> Now: the Emacs seems not to be usable for me because of one thing (so far): on a german keyboard there are several
> important charakters only available in combination with "normal" keys and the ALT-key (= Meta-key in Emacs). In Emacs
> there are key bindings with the ALT-key and that's ok, but all the special characters (e.g. \, |, [, ], {, }, @, ~, „ “
> etc.), which I need kind of frequently (among others for LaTeX) are not available here.
> And I think that's kind of distressing, because the CMD-key (Mac) or Window-key, which seems to be on every keyboard
> these days, is directly next to the ALT-key and not used at all.
>
> So the thing seems this to me: even I'd like to explore the Emacs more I am afraid I have to leave it as a serious
> option.
This is a duplicate of 5206 et al.
Unfortunately it's a question of defaults and there doesn't seem to be
a satisfactory solution.
If you're sure you never want to use the bindings on cmd, which
correspond with macOS shortcuts, you can put something like:
(setq ns-alternate-modifier 'none
ns-command-modifier 'meta)
in your init.el. There are other options which are described in the
"Mac / GNUstep Customization" section of the manual.
--
Alan Third
Severity set to 'wishlist' from 'normal'
Request was from
Alan Third <alan <at> idiocy.org>
to
control <at> debbugs.gnu.org
.
(Tue, 16 Nov 2021 21:21:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 3 years and 208 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.