GNU bug report logs - #1566
23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 1566 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 1566 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:30:12 -0800

I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just
after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit
from that input.
 
Please take the suggestions in that message into consideration. I
filed the bug, and I still think there's room for improvement.
 

In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2008-11-24 on LENNART-69DE564
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include
-fno-crossjumping'
 

Message #10 received at 1566 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 1566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:50:06 -0500

merge 1566 1352
stop

Drew Adams wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 14:30 -0800):

> I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just
> after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit
> from that input.

Information sent after a bug is closed still gets added to the bug report.
Only after 28 days of no activity, the bug is archived. At that point,
you cannot directly add more information to it.

Your input was received.

Message #17 received at 1566 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Glenn Morris'" <rgm <at> gnu.org>, <1566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:08:27 -0800

> > I believe that the last input I sent to bug #1352 was received just
> > after the bug got closed. IOW, the naming fix made did not benefit
> > from that input.
> 
> Information sent after a bug is closed still gets added to 
> the bug report.
> Only after 28 days of no activity, the bug is archived. At that point,
> you cannot directly add more information to it.
> 
> Your input was received.

I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My impression is
that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it was received. I think he did
not have the benefit of that input. I'm asking that the additional input be
considered, even though the bug was closed before it came in.

Message #20 received at 1566 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 1566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:10:43 -0500

Drew Adams wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 15:08 -0800):

> I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
> impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
> was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm
> asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug
> was closed before it came in.

I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.

Message #25 received at 1566 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Glenn Morris'" <rgm <at> gnu.org>, <1566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:42:38 -0800

> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm
> > asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug
> > was closed before it came in.
> 
> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.

Clever. ;-)

You're sure, but I'm not.
Now Juri is at least aware of the input.

Message #30 received at 1566 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> jurta.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: 1566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2008 02:45:45 +0200

>> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
>> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
>> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of that input. I'm
>> > asking that the additional input be considered, even though the bug
>> > was closed before it came in.
>>
>> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.
>
> Clever. ;-)
>
> You're sure, but I'm not.
> Now Juri is at least aware of the input.

I don't know is it possible to reply to #1352.  There is some spam at
the end of http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352

-- 
Juri Linkov
http://www.jurta.org/emacs/

Message #35 received at 1566 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Juri Linkov'" <juri <at> jurta.org>
Cc: <1566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: bug#1566: 23.0.60; bug #1352 was closed before the last input
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:14:52 -0800

Hi Juri,

> >> > I know that it was received - I can see that in the bug list. My
> >> > impression is that Juri made his fix and closed the bug before it
> >> > was received. I think he did not have the benefit of 
> >> > that input. I'm asking that the additional input be considered,
> >> > even though the bug was closed before it came in.
> >>
> >> I'm sure your input was given the attention it deserves.
> >
> > Clever. ;-)
> >
> > You're sure, but I'm not.
> > Now Juri is at least aware of the input.
> 
> I don't know is it possible to reply to #1352.  There is some spam at
> the end of 
> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352

Hm; so there is - dunno what that's about.

Anyway, the input I was hoping you'd take a look at and think about is in the
bug report, as Message #50:

http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=1352#50

No need to reply, unless you have a question about what I meant. Do whatever you
think is best.

Thx - Drew

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.