GNU bug report logs - #1565
23.0.60; bug #374 is still a bug

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>

Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 22:15:03 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Merged with 374

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 1565 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 1565 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#1565; Package emacs. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: <emacs-pretest-bug <at> gnu.org>
Subject: 23.0.60; bug #374 is still a bug
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 14:10:48 -0800
The symptoms described in bug #374 are still the same: 
 
All Info links respect mouse-1-click-follows-link, except those in the
header line.
 
All links appear the same, and they should all act the same. Links in
the header line should respect mouse-1-click-follows-link, like all
the others.
 
There needs to be a way to optionally prevent mouse-1 from following
all links, including those, such as these that might be implemented
as buttons.
 
 

In GNU Emacs 23.0.60.1 (i386-mingw-nt5.1.2600)
 of 2008-11-24 on LENNART-69DE564
Windowing system distributor `Microsoft Corp.', version 5.1.2600
configured using `configure --with-gcc (3.4) --no-opt --cflags -Ic:/g/include
-fno-crossjumping'
 





Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#1565; Package emacs. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 1565 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 1565 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#1565: 23.0.60; bug #374 is still a bug
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 17:45:13 -0500
merge 1565 374
stop

Drew Adams wrote (on Sat, 13 Dec 2008 at 14:10 -0800):

> The symptoms described in bug #374 are still the same: 

That report is still open. So are hundreds of others.
Please don't waste everyone's time by opening duplicate reports.




Forcibly Merged 374 1565. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com. (Sat, 13 Dec 2008 23:18:07 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Information forwarded to bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>:
bug#1565; Package emacs. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>. Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #15 received at 1565 <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Glenn Morris'" <rgm <at> gnu.org>, <1565 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: RE: bug#1565: 23.0.60; bug #374 is still a bug
Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 15:17:08 -0800
> > The symptoms described in bug #374 are still the same: 
> 
> That report is still open. So are hundreds of others.
> Please don't waste everyone's time by opening duplicate reports.

My bad. I was searching the page after clicking "archived and unarchived
reports", and the search apparently got restarted above where the Resolved bugs
start.

Why all the bugs are on the same page, but not all are shown until you click
"archived and unarchived reports", I don't know. Searching the page initially
will not find an archived report, but after clicking that link it will. But
searching apparently always finds an Outstanding bug. Inconsistent and
confusing. It would be nice to be able to more easily search all bugs or just
some category (or categories) of bugs.

But as you say, this is not the place to discuss problems with the bug tracker.
Sorry for getting the impression that this particular bug was not open - it was
a mistake.





bug closed, send any further explanations to 374 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> Request was from Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 08 Jul 2012 08:34:06 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 05 Aug 2012 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 12 years and 326 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.