GNU bug report logs -
#64452
[Wishlist/PATCH] Use special-mode for *Native-compile-log*, *Async-native-compile-log*
Previous Next
Full log
Message #20 received at 64452 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> From: No Wayman <iarchivedmywholelife <at> gmail.com>
>> Cc: Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier
>> <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 64452 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
>> Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2023 18:21:00 -0400
>>
>> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > Thanks, but why not elisp-compile-mode, like we do in
>> > *Compile-log*
>> > buffers for byte compilation?
>>
>> Works for me. Revision attached.
>>
>> diff --git a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
>> index 22fb08e4688..5f42d10407f 100644
>> --- a/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
>> +++ b/lisp/emacs-lisp/comp.el
>> @@ -1133,7 +1133,8 @@ comp-log-to-buffer
>> (log-buffer
>> (or (get-buffer comp-log-buffer-name)
>> (with-current-buffer (get-buffer-create comp-log-buffer-name)
>> - (setf buffer-read-only t)
>> + (unless (derived-mode-p 'emacs-lisp-compilation-mode)
>> + (emacs-lisp-compilation-mode))
>
> bytecomp.el uses
>
> (unless (derived-mode-p 'compilation-mode)
> (emacs-lisp-compilation-mode))
>
> Isn't that better?
>
> Also, do we really need to do this twice in comp-run-async-workers?
>
> Andrea, any comments?
No, haven't tried it but it LGTM form here.
Bests
Andrea
This bug report was last modified 2 years and 13 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.