GNU bug report logs - #53892
guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#52347: closed (Shell: error when -m manifest is removed)
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 14:06:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:04:54 -0500
with message-id <874k4gjvqx.fsf <at> gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #53892,
regarding Shell: error when -m manifest is removed
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
53892: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=53892
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Cayetano Santos <cayetano.santos <at> inventati.org>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Subject: Shell: error when -m manifest is removed
Date: Tue, 07 Dec 2021 09:33:35 +0100

Hi guix,

 Using latest guix, and considering a local manifest.scm file 
 with only

   (specifications->manifest (list "python"))

 Following command works

   guix shell --container -m manifest.scm -- python3

 But

   guix shell --container -- python3

gives an error. However,

   guix shell --container

followed by

   python3

works.

 So, by just removing the ’-m manifest.scm’ flag, I get an error.

Regards,

Cayetano Santos

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, 53892-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:04:54 -0500

tags 53892 notabug
--

Hi Ludovic,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz> skribis:
>
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> $ guix shell -C -- make
>>> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
>>> guix shell: error: make: command not found
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>
>>> The last command exhibit the problem.
>>
>> I believe this is [1].
>>
>> [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18
>
> Should we close as “notabug”?

That seems reasonable; and I see it's already documented as such.

Good for me!  Thanks for pointing it out.

Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.