GNU bug report logs - #53892
guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 53892 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 53892 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-guix <bug-guix <at> gnu.org>
Subject: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2022 23:19:02 -0500

Hello Guix!

Consider the following:

--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ mkdir /tmp/test && cd /tmp/test

$ cat <<EOF > manifest.scm
(packages->manifest
 (list (specification->package "make")))
EOF

$ guix shell
guix shell: error: not loading '/tmp/test/manifest.scm' because not authorized to do so
hint: To allow automatic loading of `/tmp/test/manifest.scm' when running `guix shell', you must explicitly
authorize its directory, like so:

     echo /tmp/test >> /home/maxim/.config/guix/shell-authorized-directories

$ echo /tmp/test >> /home/maxim/.config/guix/shell-authorized-directories

$ guix shell
guix shell: loading environment from '/tmp/test/manifest.scm'...
The following derivation will be built:
   /gnu/store/886dfpr1fc43insawzbnk8s713bh9nf8-profile.drv

building CA certificate bundle...
listing Emacs sub-directories...
building fonts directory...
building directory of Info manuals...
The following builds are still in progress:
  /gnu/store/40p4vzxxmhz6ah25cx4iil3v5f87lmwn-info-dir.drv
  /gnu/store/k0jkw8rfskymq3lnkdjs9ljmccvbwcc3-fonts-dir.drv
  /gnu/store/y3y53p535v0nqvfjlzb3bw352m78xmdx-emacs-subdirs.drv

The following builds are still in progress:
  /gnu/store/40p4vzxxmhz6ah25cx4iil3v5f87lmwn-info-dir.drv
  /gnu/store/k0jkw8rfskymq3lnkdjs9ljmccvbwcc3-fonts-dir.drv

The following build is still in progress:
  /gnu/store/40p4vzxxmhz6ah25cx4iil3v5f87lmwn-info-dir.drv

building profile with 1 package...

[env]$ exit

$ guix shell -C -- make
guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
guix shell: error: make: command not found
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---

The last command exhibit the problem.

Thanks,

Maxim

Message #8 received at 53892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
To: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>, 53892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:15:30 +0100

Hi Maxim,

Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:

> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
> $ guix shell -C -- make
> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
> guix shell: error: make: command not found
> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>
> The last command exhibit the problem.

I believe this is [1].

[1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18

Best,
-- 
Josselin Poiret

Message #11 received at 53892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
Cc: 53892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, GNU Debbugs <control <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2022 10:40:22 -0500

merge 52347 53892
thanks

Hello Josselin!

Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz> writes:

> Hi Maxim,
>
> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> $ guix shell -C -- make
>> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
>> guix shell: error: make: command not found
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> The last command exhibit the problem.
>
> I believe this is [1].
>
> [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18

Oh, I had missed it; thanks for pointing it out.  I've merged the two
issues.

Thank you!

Maxim

Message #16 received at 53892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
To: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>
Cc: 53892 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 11:41:06 +0100

Hi,

Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz> skribis:

> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>> $ guix shell -C -- make
>> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
>> guix shell: error: make: command not found
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> The last command exhibit the problem.
>
> I believe this is [1].
>
> [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18

Should we close as “notabug”?

Ludo’.

Message #21 received at 53892-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com>
To: Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz>, 53892-close <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#53892: guix shell not reading manifest.scm when used with '--'
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2022 09:04:54 -0500

tags 53892 notabug
--

Hi Ludovic,

Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Hi,
>
> Josselin Poiret <dev <at> jpoiret.xyz> skribis:
>
>> Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer <at> gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>> $ guix shell -C -- make
>>> guix shell: warning: no packages specified; creating an empty environment
>>> guix shell: error: make: command not found
>>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>>
>>> The last command exhibit the problem.
>>
>> I believe this is [1].
>>
>> [1] https://issues.guix.gnu.org/52347#18
>
> Should we close as “notabug”?

That seems reasonable; and I see it's already documented as such.

Good for me!  Thanks for pointing it out.

Maxim

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.