GNU bug report logs - #46733
gnus-article-treat-128-255 for the chars that gnus-article-treat-non-ascii forgot

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>

Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 00:21:04 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: wontfix

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: 積丹尼 Dan Jacobson <jidanni <at> jidanni.org>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: gnus-article-treat-128-255 for the chars that
 gnus-article-treat-non-ascii forgot
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 21:23:42 +0800
Regarding this character,

                 position: 563 of 1094 (51%), column: 25
                character: \xa0 (displayed as \xa0) (codepoint 4194208, #o17777640, #x3fffa0)
                  charset: eight-bit (Raw bytes 128-255)
    code point in charset: 0xA0
                   syntax: w 	which means: word
                 category: L:Left-to-right (strong)
                 to input: type "C-x 8 RET 3fffa0"
              buffer code: #xA0
                file code: not encodable by coding system utf-8-unix
                  display: no font available

    Character code properties: customize what to show
      general-category: Cn (Other, Not Assigned)
      decomposition: (4194208) ...

Is it ASCII? No.
No.
Does gnus-article-treat-non-ascii treat it?
No.
"It's not Unicode."
That's right. And it also isn't ASCII.
"Well then don't worry about it. They will be caught at the
  Non-printable characters found.  Continue sending? (delete, replace, send, edit, ?):
prompt."

Hey, I never said I want to send anything. I'm talking about just
looking at them.

As you can see, those characters are so terrible, they deserve their own
gnus-article-treat-128-255 !!




This bug report was last modified 4 years and 88 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.