GNU bug report logs - #3950
23.0.91; hs-minor-mode should obey hs-search-mode for viper searches too

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Guido Van Hoecke <gnuemacs <at> vanhoecke.org>

Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 17:50:05 UTC

Severity: normal

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Mauro Aranda <maurooaranda <at> gmail.com>
To: 3950 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Guido Van Hoecke <gnuemacs <at> vanhoecke.org>
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: bug#3950: 23.0.91; hs-minor-mode should obey hs-search-mode for viper searches too
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2025 12:02:08 -0300
Guido Van Hoecke <gnuemacs <at> vanhoecke.org> writes:

> Stefan Monnier wrote:
>>> Right now, I must open the fold ('hs-toggle-hiding') and search again
>>> ('viper-search-next') if I want to position point at the searched
>>> text. I feel that this should be automated as it is done for
>>> 'isearch'.
>>
>> You might want to try reveal-mode as well (don't know if it works with
>> Viper's search, but it might, and if not, it's also a bug).
>
> I didn't know reveal-mode, shame on me!
>
> Thanks Stefan, both for having written it and for pointing my nose in
> the proper direction! It works with viper's search, so no bug there!
>

I took a look at this bug report, but I'm not sure what should be done
about it.

Looking at viper-search, it doesn't support the search-invisible option.
I guess we could add support for that option, considering it as an
extension, reusing the isearch code for opening/closing overlays.  But,
at that point, there's not much difference between viper-search and
viper-isearch-{forward,backward}.

Any opinions? My feeling that it's still OK to add the support for
search-invisible, but since I never use viper, I can't be sure.





This bug report was last modified 81 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.