GNU bug report logs -
#38553
[PATCH 00/12] Add two KDE packages and 10 KDE utils
Previous Next
Full log
Message #50 received at 38553 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,
Hartmut Goebel <h.goebel <at> crazy-compilers.com> skribis:
>>> + (modify-phases (@ (guix build qt-build-system) %standard-phases)
>> ^
>> As a rule of thumb, we should avoid using ‘@’ and ‘@@’. So here, I’d
>> suggest writing
>>
>> #:modules ((guix build qt-build-system) …)
>>
>> to make sure that module is in scope.
>
> AFAIU the module already is in scope, since it is part of
> %qt-build-system-modules. What I intend here is to address
> "%standard-phases" as defined in (guix build qt-build-system).
Actually, unless I’m mistaken, (guix build qt-build-system) is not in
scope by default. To fix it, we need:
[Message part 2 (text/x-patch, inline)]
diff --git a/guix/build-system/qt.scm b/guix/build-system/qt.scm
index b776845377..e2f277d3ca 100644
--- a/guix/build-system/qt.scm
+++ b/guix/build-system/qt.scm
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
(qt-wrap-excluded-outputs ''())
(system (%current-system))
(imported-modules %qt-build-system-modules)
- (modules '((guix build cmake-build-system)
+ (modules '((guix build qt-build-system)
(guix build utils))))
"Build SOURCE using CMAKE, and with INPUTS. This assumes that SOURCE
provides a 'CMakeLists.txt' file as its build system."
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ provides a 'CMakeLists.txt' file as its build system."
(system (%current-system))
(build (nix-system->gnu-triplet system))
(imported-modules %qt-build-system-modules)
- (modules '((guix build cmake-build-system)
+ (modules '((guix build qt-build-system)
(guix build utils))))
"Cross-build NAME using CMAKE for TARGET, where TARGET is a GNU triplet and
with INPUTS. This assumes that SOURCE provides a 'CMakeLists.txt' file as its
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
Does that make sense?
With this change in place, no need for ‘@’! :-)
>>> + (license (list license:gpl2+ license:lgpl2.0+ license:fdl1.2+))))
>> Could you add a comment explaining whether this is triple-license or
>> something else?
>
> This seems to be common to many KDE packages including programs, libs
> and docs. Programs have GPL, libs have LGPL and docs have FDL. Of course
> I can add a respective comment, which most of the packages would get. Is
> this your intention?
Oh I see. Yes, that was my intention, but I guess you could make a
super-concise one-line summary of that.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
This bug report was last modified 5 years and 153 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.