GNU bug report logs - #19793
please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#19793: closed (please document level of R7RS[-small] support
 in Guile manual)
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:22:01 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:21:24 +0200
with message-id <877fd98et7.fsf <at> pobox.com>
and subject line Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #19793,
regarding please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
19793: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=19793
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: "andrew <at> cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:56:33 +0100

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile supports R7RS[-small],
and what R7RS features are still missing.
Something along the lines of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html
but up to date.
thanks

[Message part 4 (text/html, inline)]

[Message part 5 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: 19793-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:21:24 +0200

Reporter unavailable, closing bug.

On Tue 28 Jun 2016 11:31, MAILER-DAEMON <at> pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Mail Delivery System) writes:

> This is the mail system at host pb-sasl1.pobox.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
>
> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
>
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
>
>                    The mail system
>
> <andrew <at> cachedot.net>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
>     name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl1.pobox.com
> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9B24A20804
> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; wingo <at> pobox.com
> Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; andrew <at> cachedot.net
> Original-Recipient: rfc822;andrew <at> cachedot.net
> Action: failed
> Status: 4.4.3
> Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error
>     for name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again
>
> From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
> Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual
> To: "andrew <at> cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net>
> Cc: 19793 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 (5 days, 7 hours, 5 minutes ago)
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Would you be willing to create such a document?  Contributions would be
> happily accepted :)  Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template
> (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess).
>
> Andy
>
> On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew <at> cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net> writes:
>
>> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile
>> supports R7RS[-small],
>>
>> and what R7RS features are still missing.
>>
>> Something along the lines of
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html
>>
>> but up to date.
>>
>> thanks
> ----------

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.