GNU bug report logs - #19793
please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: andrew <at> cachedot.net

Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 16:45:05 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 19793 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 19793 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#19793; Package guile. (Fri, 06 Feb 2015 16:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to andrew <at> cachedot.net:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guile <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 06 Feb 2015 16:45:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "andrew <at> cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net>
To: bug-guile <at> gnu.org
Subject: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 09:56:33 +0100
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile supports R7RS[-small],
and what R7RS features are still missing.
Something along the lines of https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html
but up to date.
thanks
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Information forwarded to bug-guile <at> gnu.org:
bug#19793; Package guile. (Thu, 23 Jun 2016 09:15:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 19793 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: "andrew\@cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net>
Cc: 19793 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile
 manual
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200
Hi Andrew,

Would you be willing to create such a document?  Contributions would be
happily accepted :)  Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template
(just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess).

Andy

On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew <at> cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net> writes:

> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile
> supports R7RS[-small],
>
> and what R7RS features are still missing.
>
> Something along the lines of
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html
>
> but up to date.
>
> thanks




Reply sent to Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:22:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to andrew <at> cachedot.net:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Tue, 28 Jun 2016 16:22:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 19793-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: 19793-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Undelivered Mail Returned to Sender
Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2016 18:21:24 +0200
Reporter unavailable, closing bug.

On Tue 28 Jun 2016 11:31, MAILER-DAEMON <at> pb-sasl1.pobox.com (Mail Delivery System) writes:

> This is the mail system at host pb-sasl1.pobox.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
> be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
>
> For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
>
> If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
> delete your own text from the attached returned message.
>
>                    The mail system
>
> <andrew <at> cachedot.net>: Host or domain name not found. Name service error for
>     name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again
>
> Reporting-MTA: dns; pb-sasl1.pobox.com
> X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 9B24A20804
> X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; wingo <at> pobox.com
> Arrival-Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 05:14:45 -0400 (EDT)
>
> Final-Recipient: rfc822; andrew <at> cachedot.net
> Original-Recipient: rfc822;andrew <at> cachedot.net
> Action: failed
> Status: 4.4.3
> Diagnostic-Code: X-Postfix; Host or domain name not found. Name service error
>     for name=cachedot.net type=MX: Host not found, try again
>
> From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
> Subject: Re: bug#19793: please document level of R7RS[-small] support in Guile manual
> To: "andrew <at> cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net>
> Cc: 19793 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2016 11:14:38 +0200 (5 days, 7 hours, 5 minutes ago)
>
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Would you be willing to create such a document?  Contributions would be
> happily accepted :)  Take a look at doc/ref/r6rs.texi for a template
> (just the incompatibilities and general overview section I guess).
>
> Andy
>
> On Fri 06 Feb 2015 09:56, "andrew <at> cachedot.net" <andrew <at> cachedot.net> writes:
>
>> It would be nice if the Guile manual described to what extent Guile
>> supports R7RS[-small],
>>
>> and what R7RS features are still missing.
>>
>> Something along the lines of
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-02/msg00065.html
>>
>> but up to date.
>>
>> thanks
> ----------




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Wed, 27 Jul 2016 11:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 8 years and 327 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.