GNU bug report logs - #14220
24.3; Odd vertical height of some glyphs in certain fonts

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>

Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 08:21:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed, moreinfo

Found in version 24.3

Fixed in version 27.1

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #8 received at 14220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Kenichi Handa <handa <at> gnu.org>
To: Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org>
Cc: 14220 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14220: 24.3;
	Odd vertical height of some glyphs in certain fonts
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 20:45:01 +0900
In article <87obddd13n.fsf <at> sc3d.org>, Reuben Thomas <rrt <at> sc3d.org> writes:

> If I set variable-pitch-face to Droid Serif, the right arrow → is much
> taller than most other glyphs, effectively forcing extra space after
> lines containing it. In DejaVu Serif, this does not happen.

Are you sure that your Emacs is using the Droid Serif font
for "→"?  I've just installed the droid-ttf package
(ubuntu), but the installed Droid Sefif font:

  /usr/share/fonts/truetype/droid/DroidSerif-Regular.ttf

does not contain a glyph for → (U+2192), so Emacs uses some
other automatically found font for that character.  Please
check which font is used for → in your Emacs by putting
cursor on that character and type C-u C-x =.  If you do find
that your Emacs is using the Droid Serif font, could you
please send me that font?

> In LibreOffice and GEdit this problem does not occur.

There's a possibility that they find a better alternative
font than what Emacs finds.

---
Kenichi Handa
handa <at> gnu.org





This bug report was last modified 5 years and 283 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.