GNU bug report logs - #14221
24.2 or 24.1; fatal_error_signal: Process /usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2] was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 14221 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 14221 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Petr Hracek <phracek <at> redhat.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.2 or 24.1; fatal_error_signal: Process /usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2]
	was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2013 10:21:38 +0200

Hi folks,

I have just a question related to emacs-24.[1|2] versions.
Sometimes as on my PC as from BZ reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861084
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878455
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895751
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908649

emacs crashed with SIGSEGV.

Each BZ reports have the same text like:
[abrt] emacs-24.[1|2]-[version].fc[17|18]: fatal_error_signal: Process 
/usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2] was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)

Do you know what causes that problems?
Are these problems known?

I tried to find out any patches related to that problem but without success.
I think that it is related to issues that emacs is started as server/deamon
but I am not sure for that.

-- 
S pozdravem / Best regards

Petr Hracek

Message #8 received at 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Petr Hracek <phracek <at> redhat.com>
Subject: Re: bug#14221: 24.2 or 24.1;
	fatal_error_signal: Process /usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2] was killed by
	signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2013 19:24:22 -0400

Petr Hracek wrote:

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861084
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878455
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895751
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908649

There are some backtraces there if anyone wants to take a look.

The most helpful thing with crashes would be a backtrace from an Emacs
24.3 built without optimization. If there is such, please send it here.

Message #11 received at 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Petr Hracek <phracek <at> redhat.com>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14221: 24.2 or 24.1;
	fatal_error_signal: Process /usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2]
	was killed by signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 13:31:29 +0200

emacs is build up with:
%configure --with-dubs --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png 
--with-x-toolkit=gtk3

How to change compilation for huge traces?

On 04/20/2013 01:24 AM, Glenn Morris wrote:
> Petr Hracek wrote:
>
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=861084
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=878455
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895751
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=908649
> There are some backtraces there if anyone wants to take a look.
>
> The most helpful thing with crashes would be a backtrace from an Emacs
> 24.3 built without optimization. If there is such, please send it here.


-- 
Best regards / S pozdravem
Petr Hracek

Message #14 received at 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Petr Hracek <phracek <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14221: 24.2 or 24.1;
	fatal_error_signal: Process /usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2] was killed by
	signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 11:57:16 -0400

Petr Hracek wrote:

> emacs is build up with:
> %configure --with-dubs --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png
> --with-x-toolkit=gtk3
>
> How to change compilation for huge traces?

Something like:

CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" configure ...

Message #17 received at 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Petr Hracek <phracek <at> redhat.com>
Cc: 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14221: 24.2 or 24.1;
	fatal_error_signal: Process /usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2] was killed by
	signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Date: Tue, 14 May 2013 13:14:28 -0400

Glenn Morris wrote:

> Something like:
>
> CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" configure ...

PS It is also good to then run Emacs from its src/ directory, so it
picks up its .gdbinit (you may need to set gdb's auto-load safe-path).
Then do `backtrace full' when it crashes.

Message #22 received at 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Petr Hracek <phracek <at> redhat.com>, 14221 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#14221: 24.2 or 24.1;
 fatal_error_signal: Process /usr/bin/emacs-24.[1|2] was killed by
 signal 11 (SIGSEGV)
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 2015 00:26:37 +0100

Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> writes:

> Petr Hracek wrote:
>
>> emacs is build up with:
>> %configure --with-dubs --with-gif --with-jpeg --with-png
>> --with-x-toolkit=gtk3
>>
>> How to change compilation for huge traces?
>
> Something like:
>
> CFLAGS="-O0 -g3" configure ...

More information was requested, but no response was given within a few
months, so I'm closing this bug report.  If the problem still exists,
please reopen this bug report.
-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
   bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.