GNU bug report logs - #13194
24.2; show-stopper in report-emacs-bug

Previous Next

Package: debbugs.gnu.org;

Reported by: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>

Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:40:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Merged with 14811

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 13194 AT debbugs.gnu.org.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13194; Package emacs. (Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:40:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:40:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 24.2; show-stopper in report-emacs-bug
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 10:37:40 -0500
Dear GNU people:

*PLEASE DEFEND BUG-GNU-EMACS REPORTERS' ADDRESSES*

Current system: Report an Emacs bug after supper, get spam before breakfast.

		Peace
			--Devon

P.S. Thinly masked addresses like

Reported by: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>

are grist for the robo harvesters' spam mills.





Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13194; Package emacs. (Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:45:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 13194 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
To: 13194 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>
Subject: Re: bug#13194: 24.2; show-stopper in report-emacs-bug
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 23:43:43 +0800
> P.S. Thinly masked addresses like
> Reported by: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>
> are grist for the robo harvesters' spam mills.

Maybe the debbugs.gnu.org web interface doesn't need to show email
addresses anymore; Emacs developers can always get them via the SOAP
interface, using the debbugs package.

Any objections?




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13194; Package emacs. (Sat, 15 Dec 2012 15:56:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #11 received at 13194 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 13194 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net
Subject: Re: bug#13194: 24.2; show-stopper in report-emacs-bug
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 17:54:01 +0200
> From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 23:43:43 +0800
> Cc: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>
> 
> > P.S. Thinly masked addresses like
> > Reported by: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>
> > are grist for the robo harvesters' spam mills.
> 
> Maybe the debbugs.gnu.org web interface doesn't need to show email
> addresses anymore; Emacs developers can always get them via the SOAP
> interface, using the debbugs package.
> 
> Any objections?

No objections here, as long as:

 1) downloading messages in mbox format still shows the original
    addresses without any "disguise", and

 2) whatever disguises the addresses does NOT also munge anything that
    looks like an address, but isn't, like @code{foo} etc.




Information forwarded to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#13194; Package emacs. (Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #14 received at 13194 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
To: Devon Sean McCullough <Emacs-Hacker2012 <at> jovi.net>
Cc: 13194 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#13194: 24.2; show-stopper in report-emacs-bug
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2012 13:20:40 -0500
reassign 13194 debbugs.gnu.org
stop

Devon Sean McCullough wrote:

> Current system: Report an Emacs bug after supper, get spam before breakfast.

I'm sympathetic, but think this is an exaggeration.
If I search for your unobscured literal email address, I find several
hits from sites such as: anonscm.debian.org, www.update.uu.se,
repo.or.cz, bitbucket.org, nntp.intelliseek.com, etc. Many of these are
mirrors of the Emacs source code (your address is in ChangeLogs), or of
the gnu.emacs.bug newsgroup (you've posted before with the same
address). None of these sites are under our control, and further
obscuring debbugs.gnu.org will have zero impact on them.

Currently, there are 663 stored Spam messages that arrived on
debbugs.gnu.org since November 1. The vast majority were sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu etc. Only a tiny fraction (9) were sent to
###@debbugs.gnu addresses. In fact there are just two bugs that got spam
(5475 and 3643). Since the ###@debbugs addresses appear on the site with
the same obscuration, I conclude that it is fairly effective. If your
initial hyperbole were true, I would expect to see many more ###@debbugs
addresses getting spam, and many more recent bugs.

But I'm certainly open for specific suggestions for improvement.




bug reassigned from package 'emacs' to 'debbugs.gnu.org'. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

bug No longer marked as found in versions 24.2. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 15 Dec 2012 18:22:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Merged 13194 14811. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 07 Jul 2013 17:29:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 11 years and 343 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.