GNU bug report logs - #9567
curious match bug (?)

Previous Next

Package: guile;

Reported by: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>

Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 03:36:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9567: closed (curious match bug (?))
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 16:40:01 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:38:52 +0200
with message-id <87wrc4lwmb.fsf <at> gnu.org>
and subject line Re: bug#9567: `match' bug ?
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #9567,
regarding curious match bug (?)
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
9567: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=9567
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>
To: bug-guile <bug-guile <at> gnu.org>
Subject: curious match bug (?)
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2011 05:34:36 +0200
Hi,

Try this:

  (use-modules (language tree-il) (ice-9 match))
  (define foo (parse-tree-il '(let-values (apply (lambda () (lambda-case ((() #f #f #f () ()) (apply (primitive values) (const 1) (const 2)))))) (lambda-case (((a b) #f #f #f () (#{a 134390}# #{b 134391}#)) (apply (primitive list) (lexical a #{a 134390}#) (lexical b #{b 134391}#)))))))
  (match foo
    (($ <let-values> src exp
        ($ <lambda-case> src2 req #f #f #f () gensyms body #f))
     #t)
    (_
     #f))
  => #t
                         
  (match foo
    (($ <let-values> src foo ;; <- rename "exp" to "foo"
        ($ <lambda-case> src2 req #f #f #f () gensyms body #f))
     #t)
    (_
     #f))
  => #f

I tried to reduce this case a bit, but didn't succeed directly, and I
need to move on.  But what is the deal here?

Andy
-- 
http://wingolog.org/


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: ludo <at> gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
To: Alex Shinn <alexshinn <at> gmail.com>
Cc: Andy Wingo <wingo <at> pobox.com>, 9567-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#9567: `match' bug ?
Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2011 18:38:52 +0200
Hi Alex,

Alex Shinn <alexshinn <at> gmail.com> skribis:

> 2011/10/15 Ludovic Courtès <ludo <at> gnu.org>:
>>
>> I’m trying to update Guile’s copy from Chibi but changeset
>> 876:528cdab3f818 in the default branch doesn’t seem to contain the fix.
>>
>> What am I missing?
>
> "hg export 851" will show you the changes, including
> the new test case.  Does it not work in Guile?

Yes.

> On the off chance you're unfamiliar with mercurial,
> did you remember to "hg update" after fetching the
> changes?

Oh indeed, I had run ‘hg pull’ (I think) but not ‘hg update’.

Thanks!

Ludo’.


This bug report was last modified 13 years and 222 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.