GNU bug report logs - #9069
(spam-initialize) should be automatic

Previous Next

Package: gnus;

Reported by: Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com>

Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 17:31:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: fixed

Found in version 5.110018

Fixed in version 24.4

Done: Lars Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Ted Zlatanov <tzz <at> lifelogs.com>
To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org>
Cc: Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com>, 9069 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#9069: (spam-initialize) should be automatic
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2012 21:26:39 -0500
On Sat, 07 Jan 2012 00:37:20 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> wrote: 

LMI> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi <at> gnus.org> writes:
>> Dave Abrahams <dave <at> boostpro.com> writes:
>> 
>>> ...at least in some cases.
>>> 
>>> I customized my group parameters and set the spam-process-destination to
>>> a different folder, and was absolutely baffled for the longest time as
>>> to why spam never got moved.  It seems to me that Gnus should detect
>>> cases where its own configuration obviously demands the use of spam.el
>>> and initialize it if necessary.
>> 
>> I agree.
>> 
>> Ted, where would the best place to put this initialisation be?

LMI> Ted, when you find some time, please have a peek at this one.  :-)

Sorry for the delay.

Can we do `spam-initialize' on group entry iff the spam group/topic
parameters are set AND it has not been run yet?  Or is that too
intrusive?

Ted




This bug report was last modified 11 years and 170 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.