GNU bug report logs - #878
indent-rigidly-reverse

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: jidanni <at> jidanni.org

Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 02:00:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: notabug, wontfix

Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (Emacs bug Tracking System)
To: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Subject: bug#878 closed by Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> (Re: 
 bug#878: indent-rigidly-reverse)
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
This is an automatic notification regarding your bug report
which was filed against the emacs package:

#878: indent-rigidly-reverse

It has been closed by Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>.

Their explanation is attached below along with your original report.
If this explanation is unsatisfactory and you have not received a
better one in a separate message then please contact Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> by
replying to this email.


-- 
878: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=878
Emacs Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: 878-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#878: indent-rigidly-reverse
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 10:00:15 -0400
>> Hitting C-x e over and over is much harder than e.g., C-x C-e, which
> In Emacs-22, both C-x z and C-x e can be repeated with "C-x z z z z z"
> or "C-x e e e e e".  Both are solutions to your problem:

> C-u - 1 C-x C-i C-x z z z z z z z z

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: indent-rigidly-reverse
Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 09:54:36 +0800
indent-rigidly is great, as I hit C-x C-i over and over, the lines
more further and further to the right.

OK, now I hereby challenge you to move those lines slowly back the
other way in the same fashion. Simple you say: use an argument of -1.
But then it becomes a giant pain trying to do that over and over.

OK, one could make a keyboard macro to do it, but still no fun.
Hitting C-x e over and over is much harder than e.g., C-x C-e, which
often one hits by accident when trying to hit the former.

Therefore you should implement a indent-rigidly-reverse and bind it to
some key, else you are offering one-way joyrides.




This bug report was last modified 16 years and 265 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.