GNU bug report logs -
#878
indent-rigidly-reverse
Previous Next
Reported by: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 02:00:03 UTC
Severity: normal
Tags: notabug, wontfix
Done: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.
To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 878 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 878 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#878
; Package
emacs
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to
jidanni <at> jidanni.org
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
indent-rigidly is great, as I hit C-x C-i over and over, the lines
more further and further to the right.
OK, now I hereby challenge you to move those lines slowly back the
other way in the same fashion. Simple you say: use an argument of -1.
But then it becomes a giant pain trying to do that over and over.
OK, one could make a keyboard macro to do it, but still no fun.
Hitting C-x e over and over is much harder than e.g., C-x C-e, which
often one hits by accident when trying to hit the former.
Therefore you should implement a indent-rigidly-reverse and bind it to
some key, else you are offering one-way joyrides.
Tags added: notabug, wontfix
Request was from
Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
to
control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
.
(Thu, 04 Sep 2008 02:55:06 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Information forwarded to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#878
; Package
emacs
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #12 received at submit <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
> Hitting C-x e over and over is much harder than e.g., C-x C-e, which
In Emacs-22, both C-x z and C-x e can be repeated with "C-x z z z z z"
or "C-x e e e e e". Both are solutions to your problem:
C-u - 1 C-x C-i C-x z z z z z z z z
Stefan
Information forwarded to
bug-submit-list <at> lists.donarmstrong.com, Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
:
bug#878
; Package
emacs
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
:
Extra info received and forwarded to list. Copy sent to
Emacs Bugs <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Reply sent to
Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
:
You have taken responsibility.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to
jidanni <at> jidanni.org
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #22 received at 878-done <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com (full text, mbox):
>> Hitting C-x e over and over is much harder than e.g., C-x C-e, which
> In Emacs-22, both C-x z and C-x e can be repeated with "C-x z z z z z"
> or "C-x e e e e e". Both are solutions to your problem:
> C-u - 1 C-x C-i C-x z z z z z z z z
bug archived.
Request was from
Debbugs Internal Request <don <at> donarmstrong.com>
to
internal_control <at> emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com
.
(Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:24:03 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 16 years and 265 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.