GNU bug report logs - #8776
rx has nothing for `explicitly numbered group construct'

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com

Date: Tue, 31 May 2011 21:28:01 UTC

Severity: wishlist

Tags: patch

Merged with 6384

Done: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 8776 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 8776 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#8776; Package emacs. (Tue, 31 May 2011 21:28:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Tue, 31 May 2011 21:28:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: rx has nothing for `explicitly numbered group construct'
Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2011 05:11:23 +0900

Hello,

rx.el in 23.1 through 24.50 has nothing for a regexp notation
of "explicitly numbered group" construct incorporated in 23.1.

Maybe would it be something like,

`(group 'NUM ...)' or `(group-n NUM ...)'

for `\(?NUM: ... \)', where NUM is an integer?

Regards,
Shigeru
Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#8776; Package emacs. (Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:14:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 8776 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com>
To: shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com
Cc: 8776 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#8776: rx has nothing for `explicitly numbered group construct'
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 17:13:12 -0400

shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com writes:

> rx.el in 23.1 through 24.50 has nothing for a regexp notation
> of "explicitly numbered group" construct incorporated in 23.1.
>
> Maybe would it be something like,
>
> `(group 'NUM ...)' or `(group-n NUM ...)'
>
> for `\(?NUM: ... \)', where NUM is an integer?

group-n sounds good.  I've added it; thanks for the suggestion.
bug closed, send any further explanations to 8776 <at> debbugs.gnu.org and shigeru.fukaya <at> gmail.com Request was from Chong Yidong <cyd <at> stupidchicken.com> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 18 Jun 2011 21:14:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Forcibly Merged 6384 8776. Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sat, 09 Jul 2011 23:34:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 07 Aug 2011 11:24:18 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 7 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.