GNU bug report logs - #8398
24.0.50; info-mode adding spurious "see" to @ref links

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jason Earl <jearl <at> notengoamigos.org>

Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 17:54:02 UTC

Severity: minor

Tags: notabug

Found in version 24.0.50

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


Message #14 received at 8398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Jason Earl <jearl <at> notengoamigos.org>
To: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 8398 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#8398: 24.0.50; info-mode adding spurious "see" to @ref links
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 13:26:00 -0600
On Thu, Mar 31 2011, Glenn Morris wrote:

> Jason Earl wrote:
>
>> For more information on info itself you can read
>> @iftex
>> @cite{Info: An Introduction}.
>> @end iftex
>> @ifnottex
>> @ref{Top, , Info, info, Info: An Introduction}.
>> @end ifnottex
>>
>> The info file produced, and it looked fine in the info client.
>>
>>    For more information on info itself you can read *note Info:
>> (info)Top.
>>
>> However, in Emacs' info-mode it looks like this:
>>
>>    For more information on info itself you can read *note Info:
>> (info)Top.
>>
>> Essentially it replaced the *note with the word "see" which makes the
>> sentence read funny.
>
> I think you mis-typed your second example...
>
> The behaviour is customizable through Info-hide-note-references.
>
> The elisp intro does not say "you can read", so looks OK IMO:
>
>    This introduction to `Programming in Emacs Lisp' has a companion
> document, see The GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
>
> Personally I think your "you can read @ref" is not really Texinfo style (?),
> which is why the result looks a bit odd.
>
> http://www.gnu.org/s/hello/manual/texinfo/ref.html

I am sorry for the noise.  I borrowed the Texinfo from the /Emacs Lisp
Intro/ (it seemed like a safe bet), and then the output appeared
differently in Emacs and the info file reader, so I thought it might be
a bug.

I am starting to realize that borrowing examples from the /Emacs Lisp
Intro/ is not a good idea.  This is the second time that has bitten me.

I will reword my Texinfo source and call it good.  Thanks for looking
into this, and, once again, sorry for the noise.

Jason Earl




This bug report was last modified 14 years and 58 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.