GNU bug report logs - #8310
update-game-score -r logic broken with MAX_SCORES

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 07:38:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#8310: closed (update-game-score -r logic broken with MAX_SCORES)
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 22:07:12 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:06:46 -0700
with message-id <4D8A6EF6.6010006 <at> cs.ucla.edu>
and subject line fix merged to trunk
has caused the GNU bug report #8310,
regarding update-game-score -r logic broken with MAX_SCORES
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
8310: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=8310
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: update-game-score -r logic broken with MAX_SCORES
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 00:37:09 -0700
Here's a bug found by gcc -Wstrict-overflow (GCC 4.5.2) this one in
in update-game-score -r.  I plan to install the following patch.

update-game-score: fix bug with -r
* update-game-score.c (main): Don't set 'scores' to garbage when
-r is specified and scorecount != MAX_SCORES.  This bug was
introduced in the 2002-04-10 change, and was found with gcc
-Wstrict-overflow (GCC 4.5.2, x86-64).
=== modified file 'lib-src/update-game-score.c'
--- lib-src/update-game-score.c	2011-02-21 18:06:25 +0000
+++ lib-src/update-game-score.c	2011-03-21 07:17:22 +0000
@@ -242,13 +242,15 @@
   push_score (&scores, &scorecount, newscore, user_id, newdata);
   sort_scores (scores, scorecount, reverse);
   /* Limit the number of scores.  If we're using reverse sorting, then
-     we should increment the beginning of the array, to skip over the
-     *smallest* scores.  Otherwise, we just decrement the number of
-     scores, since the smallest will be at the end. */
+     also increment the beginning of the array, to skip over the
+     *smallest* scores.  Otherwise, just decrementing the number of
+     scores suffices, since the smallest is at the end. */
   if (scorecount > MAX_SCORES)
-    scorecount -= (scorecount - MAX_SCORES);
-  if (reverse)
-    scores += (scorecount - MAX_SCORES);
+    {
+      if (reverse)
+	scores += (scorecount - MAX_SCORES);
+      scorecount = MAX_SCORES;
+    }
   if (write_scores (scorefile, scores, scorecount) < 0)
     {
       unlock_file (scorefile, lockstate);



[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
To: 8310-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 8318-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
	8306-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 8303-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
	8277-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 8298-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
	8290-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 8278-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: fix merged to trunk
Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:06:46 -0700
I committed a fix to the trunk for this,
as part of a recent merge (bzr 103721).


This bug report was last modified 14 years and 123 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.