GNU bug report logs - #7943
23.1; white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window

Previous Next

Full log

Message #40 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: warrenharris <at> google.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:57:31 -0800

> > > For compatibility with 8-color text terminals that cannot 
> > > produce the bright colors, IIRC.
> > 
> > My wondering is only about the _names_.  Why call a dark or 
> > dim red "red" or call a light gray "white"?
> 
> Because it would be confusing not to have a white color.

You mean a color named "white" don't you?  You've already said that such
terminals do not really have a white color.

Anyway, why?  Why would it be confusing to not have a color named "white" - if
there is in fact no white color?

Why wouldn't it be clearer to have only a color named "off white" (or "dirty
white" or ...) if the only available whitish color is off white?

> Colors can be specified by their names in Emacs, not just by their RGB
> values.

Precisely.  And color names are somewhat conventional.  Using the name "white"
for the color with RGB code FFFFFFFFF (any number 3*N of F's) is as conventional
as you can get.  Using the same name for any other color is quite
unconventional.

> By the time tty colors were added to Emacs, the names of the
> 8 ANSI colors supported by text terminals were already "common
> knowledge", so we kept them.

Times change.  History conflicts with convention sometimes.

Anyway, as I said, you'll get no complaint from me about it.  Call the color
white "black" if you like.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.