GNU bug report logs - #7943
23.1; white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window

Previous Next

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 7943 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 7943 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: warrenharris <at> google.com (Warren Harris)
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: 23.1; white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:58:57 -0800 (PST)

I am running emacs in an Apple Terminal window while ssh'd to a Linux Ubuntu 10.04.1 system. My TERM is set to xterm-color. (Note that the Apple Terminal app only supports 8 colors.) All the colors are quite dingy looking, but in particular the background is color #e5e5e5 which on my computer is fairly dark and makes the text hard to read (particularly cyan or green text). 

Here's what list-colors-display shows:

black		       black								     #000000
red		       red								     #cd0000
green		       green								     #00cd00
yellow		       yellow								     #cdcd00
blue		       blue								     #0000ee
magenta		       magenta								     #cd00cd
cyan		       cyan								     #00cdcd
white		       white								     #e5e5e5

Note that others on the emacs mailing list have been able to reproduce this problem (even on a Windows system). See the thread "white is #e5e5e5" started Jan 23, 2011.
                                                                           


In GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1)
 of 2010-11-23 on yellow, modified by Debian
configured using `configure  '--build=x86_64-linux-gnu' '--host=x86_64-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib' '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var/lib' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes' '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs23:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/23.1/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/23.1/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim' '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk' '--with-toolkit-scroll-bars' 'build_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -g -O2' 'LDFLAGS=-g' 'CPPFLAGS=''

Important settings:
  value of $LC_ALL: nil
  value of $LC_COLLATE: C
  value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
  value of $LC_MONETARY: C
  value of $LC_NUMERIC: C
  value of $LC_TIME: C
  value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
  value of $XMODIFIERS: nil
  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
  default-enable-multibyte-characters: t

Major mode: Shell

Minor modes in effect:
  csv-field-index-mode: t
  shell-dirtrack-mode: t
  menu-bar-mode: t
  file-name-shadow-mode: t
  global-font-lock-mode: t
  font-lock-mode: t
  global-auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-composition-mode: t
  auto-encryption-mode: t
  auto-compression-mode: t
  line-number-mode: t
  transient-mark-mode: t

Recent input:
SPC p u s h RET ESC [ ? 1 ; 2 c C-x 3 ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC 
[ 1 7 ~ C-x C-b C-x o C-n C-n f C-x o C-c C-c C-c C-c 
C-r 1 6 7 7 SPC t p s C-r C-a C-n C-@ ESC > C-p C-p 
C-p C-a ESC w C-x o C-y C-x C-x C-g C-x e C-g C-x ( 
ESC d C-d C-d ESC C-f ESC C-b ESC f C-k C-n C-a C-x 
) C-u 8 8 8 8 C-x e C-x C-s ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC v ESC v 
ESC v ESC v C-l C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p 
C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p 
C-p C-@ C-v C-x 1 C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n 
C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n 
ESC w C-x C-f ~ / s t a t . t x t RET C-y ESC v C-v 
ESC v ESC v C-x C-s ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC [ 1 7 ~ ESC [ 1 
5 ~ ESC > ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p 
ESC p ESC n RET ESC v C-l C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p 
C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p 
C-p C-@ ESC > C-p C-p ESC w C-x C-f ESC DEL ESC DEL 
ESC DEL ESC DEL s t TAB a t 2 . t x t RET C-y ESC y 
C-x C-s ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC v ESC v ESC x r e o DEL p o 
r t SPC e m a TAB RET

Recent messages:
History item: 8
History item: 7
Mark set
Saved text from "260KB 792B	Total cache size
1	Number of "
Making completion list...
(New file)
Mark set
Saving file /home/warrenharris/stat2.txt...
Wrote /home/warrenharris/stat2.txt

Message #8 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
To: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#7943: Acknowledgement (23.1; white background is color #e5e5e5 in
	terminal window)
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2011 08:14:54 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Note that I tried again with iTerm which supports 256 colors. $TERM was set
to xterm-256color. list-colors-display shows 256 different colors including
bright white (which really looks white), but "white" is still listed as
#e5e5e5, and the window background color is still grey.

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #11 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
To: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:39:10 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Any update on this bug? Thanks,

Warren

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #14 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:44:15 +0200

> From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 10:39:10 -0800
> Cc: 
> 
> Any update on this bug? Thanks,

Sorry for such a long delay.

This is not a bug.  The xterm colors are defined on lisp/term/xterm.el
as follows:

  (defvar xterm-standard-colors
    ;; The names in the comments taken from XTerm-col.ad in the xterm
    ;; distribution, see ftp://dickey.his.com/xterm/.  RGB values are
    ;; from rgb.txt.
    '(("black"          0 (  0   0   0))	; black
      ("red"            1 (205   0   0))	; red3
      ("green"          2 (  0 205   0))	; green3
      ("yellow"         3 (205 205   0))	; yellow3
      ("blue"           4 (  0   0 238))	; blue2
      ("magenta"        5 (205   0 205))	; magenta3
      ("cyan"           6 (  0 205 205))	; cyan3
      ("white"          7 (229 229 229))	; gray90
      ("brightblack"    8 (127 127 127))	; gray50
      ("brightred"      9 (255   0   0))	; red
      ("brightgreen"   10 (  0 255   0))	; green
      ("brightyellow"  11 (255 255   0))	; yellow
      ("brightblue"    12 (92   92 255))	; rgb:5c/5c/ff
      ("brightmagenta" 13 (255   0 255))	; magenta
      ("brightcyan"    14 (  0 255 255))	; cyan
      ("brightwhite"   15 (255 255 255)))	; white

As you see, what is called "white" in list-colors-display is actually
gray90, and its RGB components are 229 decimal, or E5 hex.  Exactly
what you see.  This definition is used to leave FFFFFF for
brightwhite, see above.

So I suggest to close this bug.

Message #17 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>,
	"'Warren Harris'" <warrenharris <at> google.com>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:18:54 -0800

>       ("white"          7 (229 229 229))	; gray90
>       ("brightwhite"   15 (255 255 255)))	; white
> 
> As you see, what is called "white" in list-colors-display is actually
> gray90....  This definition is used to leave FFFFFF for brightwhite

Wow.  I won't presume to suggest that this is misguided, but I can't help but
wonder why.  Why wouldn't white be called "white" and gray90 be called "gray90"
or "off-white" or some such?  Likewise for red and the rest.  Why change the
standard/conventional/common definition of the color name?

Just wondering.

Message #20 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Lennart Borgman <lennart.borgman <at> gmail.com>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>, Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>,
	7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 21:40:55 +0100

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com> wrote:
>>       ("white"          7 (229 229 229))      ; gray90
>>       ("brightwhite"   15 (255 255 255)))     ; white
>>
>> As you see, what is called "white" in list-colors-display is actually
>> gray90....  This definition is used to leave FFFFFF for brightwhite
>
> Wow.  I won't presume to suggest that this is misguided, but I can't help but
> wonder why.  Why wouldn't white be called "white" and gray90 be called "gray90"
> or "off-white" or some such?  Likewise for red and the rest.  Why change the
> standard/conventional/common definition of the color name?
>
> Just wondering.

Because this is Emacs? ;-)

Message #23 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: warrenharris <at> google.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 23:09:27 +0200

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: <7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:18:54 -0800
> 
> >       ("white"          7 (229 229 229))	; gray90
> >       ("brightwhite"   15 (255 255 255)))	; white
> > 
> > As you see, what is called "white" in list-colors-display is actually
> > gray90....  This definition is used to leave FFFFFF for brightwhite
> 
> Wow.  I won't presume to suggest that this is misguided, but I can't help but
> wonder why.  Why wouldn't white be called "white" and gray90 be called "gray90"
> or "off-white" or some such?

For compatibility with 8-color text terminals that cannot produce the
bright colors, IIRC.

Some text terminals can produce bright white by combining white with
another text attribute (bold, if I'm not mistaken).  Having 8-color
terminals without "white" would be confusing.

We do use "gray" on terminals that don't have this historical
precedent, see w32console.el, for example.

Message #26 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:46:57 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

All I can say is the current behavior is quite annoying when more than 8
colors are available. Many colors have very low contrast against the grey90
background, and there's no way I can see to set the background to
brightwhite. This forces me to set my TERM so that all I get is black and
white, which can also be hard on the eyes.

I guess I can try and hack my xterm.el, but it definitely seems like a bug
to me.


On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> > Cc: <7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 12:18:54 -0800
> >
> > >       ("white"          7 (229 229 229))    ; gray90
> > >       ("brightwhite"   15 (255 255 255)))   ; white
> > >
> > > As you see, what is called "white" in list-colors-display is actually
> > > gray90....  This definition is used to leave FFFFFF for brightwhite
> >
> > Wow.  I won't presume to suggest that this is misguided, but I can't help
> but
> > wonder why.  Why wouldn't white be called "white" and gray90 be called
> "gray90"
> > or "off-white" or some such?
>
> For compatibility with 8-color text terminals that cannot produce the
> bright colors, IIRC.
>
> Some text terminals can produce bright white by combining white with
> another text attribute (bold, if I'm not mistaken).  Having 8-color
> terminals without "white" would be confusing.
>
> We do use "gray" on terminals that don't have this historical
> precedent, see w32console.el, for example.
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #29 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: warrenharris <at> google.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:50:43 -0800

> For compatibility with 8-color text terminals that cannot produce the
> bright colors, IIRC.

My wondering is only about the _names_.  Why call a dark or dim red "red" or
call a light gray "white"?

Which colors the terminal can produce is one thing; what we call them is another
- no?

> Some text terminals can produce bright white by combining white with
> another text attribute (bold, if I'm not mistaken).  Having 8-color
> terminals without "white" would be confusing.

If you say so.

But isn't it also confusing that we call gray "white"?

> We do use "gray" on terminals that don't have this historical
> precedent, see w32console.el, for example.

Again, I was just wondering.  No complaint from me.

Message #34 received at 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:30:47 +0200

> From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:46:57 -0800
> Cc: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> All I can say is the current behavior is quite annoying when more than 8
> colors are available. Many colors have very low contrast against the grey90
> background

But that's the most white color that your terminal can produce.
xterm.el doesn't _tell_ the terminal what color to produce for
"white", it only _documents_ (sort of) what that color is, in terms of
RGB components.

> and there's no way I can see to set the background to brightwhite.

I don't think you can, not for the background.  But I'm not an expert
on xterm.

> I guess I can try and hack my xterm.el

I don't see how you can, but let us know if you find a way.

I'm closing this bug.  Feel free to reopen if you find a way of making
your white "whiter".

Message #37 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: warrenharris <at> google.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:46:55 +0200

> From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> Cc: <warrenharris <at> google.com>, <7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:50:43 -0800
> 
> > For compatibility with 8-color text terminals that cannot produce the
> > bright colors, IIRC.
> 
> My wondering is only about the _names_.  Why call a dark or dim red "red" or
> call a light gray "white"?

Because it would be confusing not to have a white color.

Colors can be specified by their names in Emacs, not just by their RGB
values.  By the time tty colors were added to Emacs, the names of the
8 ANSI colors supported by text terminals were already "common
knowledge", so we kept them.

Message #40 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Drew Adams" <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
To: "'Eli Zaretskii'" <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: warrenharris <at> google.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: RE: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 14:57:31 -0800

> > > For compatibility with 8-color text terminals that cannot 
> > > produce the bright colors, IIRC.
> > 
> > My wondering is only about the _names_.  Why call a dark or 
> > dim red "red" or call a light gray "white"?
> 
> Because it would be confusing not to have a white color.

You mean a color named "white" don't you?  You've already said that such
terminals do not really have a white color.

Anyway, why?  Why would it be confusing to not have a color named "white" - if
there is in fact no white color?

Why wouldn't it be clearer to have only a color named "off white" (or "dirty
white" or ...) if the only available whitish color is off white?

> Colors can be specified by their names in Emacs, not just by their RGB
> values.

Precisely.  And color names are somewhat conventional.  Using the name "white"
for the color with RGB code FFFFFFFFF (any number 3*N of F's) is as conventional
as you can get.  Using the same name for any other color is quite
unconventional.

> By the time tty colors were added to Emacs, the names of the
> 8 ANSI colors supported by text terminals were already "common
> knowledge", so we kept them.

Times change.  History conflicts with convention sometimes.

Anyway, as I said, you'll get no complaint from me about it.  Call the color
white "black" if you like.

Message #41 received at 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:55:13 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:30 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:46:57 -0800
> > Cc: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > All I can say is the current behavior is quite annoying when more than 8
> > colors are available. Many colors have very low contrast against the
> grey90
> > background
>
> But that's the most white color that your terminal can produce.
> xterm.el doesn't _tell_ the terminal what color to produce for
> "white", it only _documents_ (sort of) what that color is, in terms of
> RGB components.
>

I don't think so. The terminal is perfectly "brightwhite" before emacs
starts. This is definitely an emacs bug.


>
> > and there's no way I can see to set the background to brightwhite.
>
> I don't think you can, not for the background.  But I'm not an expert
> on xterm.
>

I know that older emacs version didn't have this problem either. BTW, this
is a bug when using Apple Terminal, not xterm. xterm seems to work fine
(whether the TERM is 'xterm' or 'xterm-color').


>
> > I guess I can try and hack my xterm.el
>
> I don't see how you can, but let us know if you find a way.
>
> I'm closing this bug.  Feel free to reopen if you find a way of making
> your white "whiter".
>

The idea was to replace "white" with the correct values, 255 255 255.

Warren

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #44 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
To: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: GNU bug Tracking System <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
Subject: Re: bug#7943: closed (Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5
	in terminal window)
Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:57:55 -0800

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I disagree with the resolution of this bug. It is still unresolved.


On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 2:31 PM, GNU bug Tracking System <
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> Your bug report
>
> #7943: 23.1; white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
>
> which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.
>
> The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
> If you require more details, please reply to 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
>
> --
> 7943: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7943
> GNU Bug Tracking System
> Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> To: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 00:30:47 +0200
> Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
> > From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 13:46:57 -0800
> > Cc: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > All I can say is the current behavior is quite annoying when more than 8
> > colors are available. Many colors have very low contrast against the
> grey90
> > background
>
> But that's the most white color that your terminal can produce.
> xterm.el doesn't _tell_ the terminal what color to produce for
> "white", it only _documents_ (sort of) what that color is, in terms of
> RGB components.
>
> > and there's no way I can see to set the background to brightwhite.
>
> I don't think you can, not for the background.  But I'm not an expert
> on xterm.
>
> > I guess I can try and hack my xterm.el
>
> I don't see how you can, but let us know if you find a way.
>
> I'm closing this bug.  Feel free to reopen if you find a way of making
> your white "whiter".
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: warrenharris <at> google.com (Warren Harris)
> To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 30 Jan 2011 10:58:57 -0800 (PST)
> Subject: 23.1; white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
> I am running emacs in an Apple Terminal window while ssh'd to a Linux
> Ubuntu 10.04.1 system. My TERM is set to xterm-color. (Note that the Apple
> Terminal app only supports 8 colors.) All the colors are quite dingy
> looking, but in particular the background is color #e5e5e5 which on my
> computer is fairly dark and makes the text hard to read (particularly cyan
> or green text).
>
> Here's what list-colors-display shows:
>
> black                  black
>                   #000000
> red                    red
>                   #cd0000
> green                  green
>                   #00cd00
> yellow                 yellow
>                  #cdcd00
> blue                   blue
>                  #0000ee
> magenta                magenta
>                   #cd00cd
> cyan                   cyan
>                  #00cdcd
> white                  white
>                   #e5e5e5
>
> Note that others on the emacs mailing list have been able to reproduce this
> problem (even on a Windows system). See the thread "white is #e5e5e5"
> started Jan 23, 2011.
>
>
>
> In GNU Emacs 23.1.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.20.1)
>  of 2010-11-23 on yellow, modified by Debian
> configured using `configure  '--build=x86_64-linux-gnu'
> '--host=x86_64-linux-gnu' '--prefix=/usr' '--sharedstatedir=/var/lib'
> '--libexecdir=/usr/lib' '--localstatedir=/var/lib'
> '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--with-pop=yes'
> '--enable-locallisppath=/etc/emacs23:/etc/emacs:/usr/local/share/emacs/23.1/site-lisp:/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/23.1/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/site-lisp:/usr/share/emacs/23.1/leim'
> '--with-x=yes' '--with-x-toolkit=gtk' '--with-toolkit-scroll-bars'
> 'build_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu' 'host_alias=x86_64-linux-gnu'
> 'CFLAGS=-DDEBIAN -g -O2' 'LDFLAGS=-g' 'CPPFLAGS=''
>
> Important settings:
>  value of $LC_ALL: nil
>  value of $LC_COLLATE: C
>  value of $LC_CTYPE: nil
>  value of $LC_MESSAGES: nil
>  value of $LC_MONETARY: C
>  value of $LC_NUMERIC: C
>  value of $LC_TIME: C
>  value of $LANG: en_US.UTF-8
>  value of $XMODIFIERS: nil
>  locale-coding-system: utf-8-unix
>  default-enable-multibyte-characters: t
>
> Major mode: Shell
>
> Minor modes in effect:
>  csv-field-index-mode: t
>  shell-dirtrack-mode: t
>  menu-bar-mode: t
>  file-name-shadow-mode: t
>  global-font-lock-mode: t
>  font-lock-mode: t
>  global-auto-composition-mode: t
>  auto-composition-mode: t
>  auto-encryption-mode: t
>  auto-compression-mode: t
>  line-number-mode: t
>  transient-mark-mode: t
>
> Recent input:
> SPC p u s h RET ESC [ ? 1 ; 2 c C-x 3 ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC
> [ 1 7 ~ C-x C-b C-x o C-n C-n f C-x o C-c C-c C-c C-c
> C-r 1 6 7 7 SPC t p s C-r C-a C-n C-@ ESC > C-p C-p
> C-p C-a ESC w C-x o C-y C-x C-x C-g C-x e C-g C-x (
> ESC d C-d C-d ESC C-f ESC C-b ESC f C-k C-n C-a C-x
> ) C-u 8 8 8 8 C-x e C-x C-s ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC v ESC v
> ESC v ESC v C-l C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p
> C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p
> C-p C-@ C-v C-x 1 C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n
> C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n C-n
> ESC w C-x C-f ~ / s t a t . t x t RET C-y ESC v C-v
> ESC v ESC v C-x C-s ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC [ 1 7 ~ ESC [ 1
> 5 ~ ESC > ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p ESC p
> ESC p ESC n RET ESC v C-l C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p
> C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p C-p
> C-p C-@ ESC > C-p C-p ESC w C-x C-f ESC DEL ESC DEL
> ESC DEL ESC DEL s t TAB a t 2 . t x t RET C-y ESC y
> C-x C-s ESC [ 1 5 ~ ESC v ESC v ESC x r e o DEL p o
> r t SPC e m a TAB RET
>
> Recent messages:
> History item: 8
> History item: 7
> Mark set
> Saved text from "260KB 792B     Total cache size
> 1       Number of "
> Making completion list...
> (New file)
> Mark set
> Saving file /home/warrenharris/stat2.txt...
> Wrote /home/warrenharris/stat2.txt
>
>
>
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #47 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 06:00:50 +0200

> From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:55:13 -0800
> Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> > But that's the most white color that your terminal can produce.
> > xterm.el doesn't _tell_ the terminal what color to produce for
> > "white", it only _documents_ (sort of) what that color is, in terms of
> > RGB components.
> >
> 
> I don't think so. The terminal is perfectly "brightwhite" before emacs
> starts. This is definitely an emacs bug.

Then perhaps you or someone else could suggest how to do that in
Emacs.

> > > and there's no way I can see to set the background to brightwhite.
> >
> > I don't think you can, not for the background.  But I'm not an expert
> > on xterm.
> >
> 
> I know that older emacs version didn't have this problem either.

The code I showed exists since 2002, and it was not changed since
written.  If you know which older Emacs version didn't behave like
this, I'd be interested to know which one.

> BTW, this is a bug when using Apple Terminal, not xterm. xterm seems
> to work fine (whether the TERM is 'xterm' or 'xterm-color').

What do you see Emacs display in xterm for the colors?  I tried that
before I responded to you the first time, and saw the same E5E5E5
value.

> The idea was to replace "white" with the correct values, 255 255 255.

I don't think it will change anything, because Emacs turns on tty
colors by their index (a small number between 0 and 7 or 15), not by
their RGB values.  If you succeed, please reopen the bug and tell what
changes were needed for that.

Message #52 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: closed (Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5
	in terminal window)
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 01:29:11 -0500

> From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:57:55 -0800
> Cc: GNU bug Tracking System <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> I disagree with the resolution of this bug. It is still unresolved.

Fair enough.  I reopened it.

Let's try again: what is the bug, please?  Your original description,
viz.:

   white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window

is not a bug.  Surely, the problem is not that Emacs considers the
white color as having this specific RGB value.  That cannot possibly
be the immediate problem for you; perhaps you think that is what
_causes_ the problem.  But what is the problem itself? what do you see
that you think is wrong?

Message #55 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: warrenharris <at> google.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: closed (Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5
	in terminal window)
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 01:55:56 -0500

> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 01:29:11 -0500
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Reply-To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Let's try again: what is the bug, please?  Your original description,
> viz.:
> 
>    white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
> 
> is not a bug.  Surely, the problem is not that Emacs considers the
> white color as having this specific RGB value.  That cannot possibly
> be the immediate problem for you; perhaps you think that is what
> _causes_ the problem.  But what is the problem itself? what do you see
> that you think is wrong?

And a couple more questions: 

  . What version of Emacs did you have before this one, that didn't
    have this problem (whatever "the problem" is)?

  . If you are using Emacs on Apple Terminal, why do you set TERM to
    "xterm" or "xterm-color"?  Are there any reasons to believe that
    the Apple Terminal is a faithful enough emulation of xterm?  (You
    say that on a real xterm, everything works fine.)

Finally, could you please try a newer version of Emacs?  v23.1 is
quite old; v23.3 was released a few days ago, and in v23.2 there were
several important changes in xterm.el, which may or may not solve your
problem.

Message #58 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:42:04 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

I believe I've figured out what was going on. It had nothing to do with the
white setting to #e5e5e5, but the fact that somehow in my .emacs file the
custom-set-faces contained the line:

 '(default ((t (:inherit nil :stipple nil :background "white" :foreground
"black" :inverse-video nil :box nil :strike-through nil :overline nil
:underline nil :slant normal :weight normal :height 115 :width normal
:foundry "unknown" :family "DejaVu Sans Mono"))))

I'm not sure how this got there, but removing the :background "white" from
it changes the window's background from dark grey to bright white again.
Text is now readable.


On Sat, Mar 12, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2011 16:55:13 -0800
> > Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > > But that's the most white color that your terminal can produce.
> > > xterm.el doesn't _tell_ the terminal what color to produce for
> > > "white", it only _documents_ (sort of) what that color is, in terms of
> > > RGB components.
> > >
> >
> > I don't think so. The terminal is perfectly "brightwhite" before emacs
> > starts. This is definitely an emacs bug.
>
> Then perhaps you or someone else could suggest how to do that in
> Emacs.
>
> > > > and there's no way I can see to set the background to brightwhite.
> > >
> > > I don't think you can, not for the background.  But I'm not an expert
> > > on xterm.
> > >
> >
> > I know that older emacs version didn't have this problem either.
>
> The code I showed exists since 2002, and it was not changed since
> written.  If you know which older Emacs version didn't behave like
> this, I'd be interested to know which one.
>
> > BTW, this is a bug when using Apple Terminal, not xterm. xterm seems
> > to work fine (whether the TERM is 'xterm' or 'xterm-color').
>
> What do you see Emacs display in xterm for the colors?  I tried that
> before I responded to you the first time, and saw the same E5E5E5
> value.
>
> > The idea was to replace "white" with the correct values, 255 255 255.
>
> I don't think it will change anything, because Emacs turns on tty
> colors by their index (a small number between 0 and 7 or 15), not by
> their RGB values.  If you succeed, please reopen the bug and tell what
> changes were needed for that.
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #61 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 20:27:35 +0200

> From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:42:04 -0700
> Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> I believe I've figured out what was going on. It had nothing to do with the
> white setting to #e5e5e5, but the fact that somehow in my .emacs file the
> custom-set-faces contained the line:
> 
>  '(default ((t (:inherit nil :stipple nil :background "white" :foreground
> "black" :inverse-video nil :box nil :strike-through nil :overline nil
> :underline nil :slant normal :weight normal :height 115 :width normal
> :foundry "unknown" :family "DejaVu Sans Mono"))))
> 
> I'm not sure how this got there, but removing the :background "white" from
> it changes the window's background from dark grey to bright white again.
> Text is now readable.

Great!  So can we close this bug now?

Message #64 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, drew.adams <at> oracle.com
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:17:50 -0700

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

yes

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> wrote:

> > From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> > Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 10:42:04 -0700
> > Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> >
> > I believe I've figured out what was going on. It had nothing to do with
> the
> > white setting to #e5e5e5, but the fact that somehow in my .emacs file the
> > custom-set-faces contained the line:
> >
> >  '(default ((t (:inherit nil :stipple nil :background "white" :foreground
> > "black" :inverse-video nil :box nil :strike-through nil :overline nil
> > :underline nil :slant normal :weight normal :height 115 :width normal
> > :foundry "unknown" :family "DejaVu Sans Mono"))))
> >
> > I'm not sure how this got there, but removing the :background "white"
> from
> > it changes the window's background from dark grey to bright white again.
> > Text is now readable.
>
> Great!  So can we close this bug now?
>

[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]

Message #67 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:23:49 -0400

>> I'm not sure how this got there, but removing the :background "white" from
>> it changes the window's background from dark grey to bright white again.
>> Text is now readable.

> Great!  So can we close this bug now?

It still sounds like a bug that setting :background to "white" makes the
background "dark grey".


        Stefan

Message #72 received at 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:50:54 +0200

> From: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 13:17:50 -0700
> Cc: drew.adams <at> oracle.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> yes

Done.

Message #75 received at 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: warrenharris <at> google.com, 7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7943: white background is color #e5e5e5 in terminal window
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 23:53:16 +0200

> From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
> Cc: Warren Harris <warrenharris <at> google.com>,  7943 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2011 17:23:49 -0400
> 
> >> I'm not sure how this got there, but removing the :background "white" from
> >> it changes the window's background from dark grey to bright white again.
> >> Text is now readable.
> 
> > Great!  So can we close this bug now?
> 
> It still sounds like a bug that setting :background to "white" makes the
> background "dark grey".

No, it makes it white.  Just not brightwhite.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.