GNU bug report logs - #79161
[PATCH] Improve Vprint_variable_mapping

Previous Next

Full log

Message #29 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zach <at> shaf.tel
Subject: Re: bug#79161: [PATCH] Improve Vprint_variable_mapping
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:01:19 +0000

"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

>> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:27:32 +0000
>> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
>> Cc: 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zach <at> shaf.tel
>>
>> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> >> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 13:36:34 +0000
>> >> From:  Pip Cet via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> >>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> "zach shaftel via \"Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors\"" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Tags: patch
>> >> >
>> >> > just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
>> >> > prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
>> >> > an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
>> >>
>> >> The "unreadeable" typo was discussed before, and we decided to keep both
>> >> spellings, though that appears never to have happened.
>> >
>> > Could you please point me to that discussion?
>> >
>> > TIA
>>
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75784
>
> Thanks.  What do you think about installing only the
> corrected-spelling patch from that discussion?

Sounds good to me. Would that work for everyone?

Pip

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.