GNU bug report logs -
#79161
[PATCH] Improve Vprint_variable_mapping
Previous Next
To reply to this bug, email your comments to 79161 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.
Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.
Report forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 03 Aug 2025 04:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent
to
zach shaftel <zach <at> shaf.tel>
:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
.
(Sun, 03 Aug 2025 04:11:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Tags: patch
just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
In GNU Emacs 31.0.50 (build 1, x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version
3.24.49, cairo version 1.18.4) of 2025-07-13 built on bigbox
Repository revision: c44903b0118357336cca964bd210835ca4881e87
Repository branch: master
System Description: Arch Linux
Configured using:
'configure --with-modules --without-xwidgets --with-native-compilation
--with-tree-sitter --without-gsettings --without-gconf --without-gpm
--with-pgtk --without-compress-install 'CFLAGS=-mtune=native
-march=native -O2 -g -fuse-ld=mold''
[0001-Improve-Vprint_variable_mapping.patch (text/patch, attachment)]
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Sun, 03 Aug 2025 13:37:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #8 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"zach shaftel via \"Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors\"" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:
> Tags: patch
>
> just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
> prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
> an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
The "unreadeable" typo was discussed before, and we decided to keep both
spellings, though that appears never to have happened. I'm okay with
just fixing it, of course!
Pip
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Aug 2025 11:54:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #11 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 00:10:11 -0400
> From: zach shaftel via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>
> just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
> prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
> an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
Thanks.
Stefan, any comments?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Aug 2025 12:03:01 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #14 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 13:36:34 +0000
> From: Pip Cet via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>
> "zach shaftel via \"Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors\"" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> > Tags: patch
> >
> > just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
> > prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
> > an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
>
> The "unreadeable" typo was discussed before, and we decided to keep both
> spellings, though that appears never to have happened.
Could you please point me to that discussion?
TIA
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:28:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #17 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 13:36:34 +0000
>> From: Pip Cet via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> "zach shaftel via \"Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors\"" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > Tags: patch
>> >
>> > just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
>> > prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
>> > an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
>>
>> The "unreadeable" typo was discussed before, and we decided to keep both
>> spellings, though that appears never to have happened.
>
> Could you please point me to that discussion?
>
> TIA
https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75784
Pip
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Mon, 04 Aug 2025 20:26:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #20 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
[0001-Improve-Vprint_variable_mapping.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 2 (text/plain, inline)]
i forgot to update the manual, a revised patch is attached.
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 00:10:11 -0400
>> From: zach shaftel via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>>
>> just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
>> prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
>> an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Stefan, any comments?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 07 Aug 2025 13:16:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #23 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: zach shaftel <zach <at> shaf.tel>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 16:25:28 -0400
>
> i forgot to update the manual, a revised patch is attached.
Thanks. Stefan, would you please take a look and tell what you think
about this?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 07 Aug 2025 13:24:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #26 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:27:32 +0000
> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
> Cc: 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zach <at> shaf.tel
>
> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 13:36:34 +0000
> >> From: Pip Cet via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> >>
> >> "zach shaftel via \"Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors\"" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >>
> >> > Tags: patch
> >> >
> >> > just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
> >> > prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
> >> > an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
> >>
> >> The "unreadeable" typo was discussed before, and we decided to keep both
> >> spellings, though that appears never to have happened.
> >
> > Could you please point me to that discussion?
> >
> > TIA
>
> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75784
Thanks. What do you think about installing only the
corrected-spelling patch from that discussion?
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:02:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #29 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 13:27:32 +0000
>> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
>> Cc: 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zach <at> shaf.tel
>>
>> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> >> Date: Sun, 03 Aug 2025 13:36:34 +0000
>> >> From: Pip Cet via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>> >> the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
>> >>
>> >> "zach shaftel via \"Bug reports for GNU Emacs, the Swiss army knife of text editors\"" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > Tags: patch
>> >> >
>> >> > just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
>> >> > prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
>> >> > an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
>> >>
>> >> The "unreadeable" typo was discussed before, and we decided to keep both
>> >> spellings, though that appears never to have happened.
>> >
>> > Could you please point me to that discussion?
>> >
>> > TIA
>>
>> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75784
>
> Thanks. What do you think about installing only the
> corrected-spelling patch from that discussion?
Sounds good to me. Would that work for everyone?
Pip
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:43:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #32 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
>> just a couple small updates to the PRINT-OVERRIDES argument to
>> prin1/prin1-to-string. fixes the typo "unreadeable-function", and adds
>> an override for `print-symbols-bare'.
> Thanks.
> Stefan, any comments?
LGTM.
Stefan
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:51:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #35 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:01:19 +0000
> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
> Cc: 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zach <at> shaf.tel
>
> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>
> >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75784
> >
> > Thanks. What do you think about installing only the
> > corrected-spelling patch from that discussion?
>
> Sounds good to me. Would that work for everyone?
It's at least a step in the right direction, IMO.
Reply sent
to
Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
:
You have taken responsibility.
(Sat, 09 Aug 2025 12:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Notification sent
to
zach shaftel <zach <at> shaf.tel>
:
bug acknowledged by developer.
(Sat, 09 Aug 2025 12:40:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #40 received at 79161-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> From: zach shaftel <zach <at> shaf.tel>
> Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>, 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 04 Aug 2025 16:25:28 -0400
>
> i forgot to update the manual, a revised patch is attached.
Thanks, installed on master, and closing the bug.
Information forwarded
to
bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
:
bug#79161
; Package
emacs
.
(Sat, 09 Aug 2025 12:50:02 GMT)
Full text and
rfc822 format available.
Message #43 received at 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
> Cc: 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zach <at> shaf.tel
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 21:50:15 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
>
> > Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 18:01:19 +0000
> > From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
> > Cc: 79161 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, zach <at> shaf.tel
> >
> > "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> >
> > >> https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=75784
> > >
> > > Thanks. What do you think about installing only the
> > > corrected-spelling patch from that discussion?
> >
> > Sounds good to me. Would that work for everyone?
>
> It's at least a step in the right direction, IMO.
I've now installed that part of the patches discussed in bug#75784.
This bug report was last modified 5 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.