GNU bug report logs - #79145
31.0.50; doc-view-mode with auto-revert-mode emitting message when it shouldn't

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Jake <jforst.mailman <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2025 03:22:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 31.0.50

Done: Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: "Tassilo Horn" <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
Cc: jforst.mailman <at> gmail.com, 79145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, michael.albinus <at> gmx.de
Subject: bug#79145: 31.0.50; doc-view-mode with auto-revert-mode emitting message when it shouldn't
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2025 08:47:24 +0300
> Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2025 21:20:07 +0200
> From: "Tassilo Horn" <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
> Cc: "Michael Albinus" <michael.albinus <at> gmx.de>, jforst.mailman <at> gmail.com,
>  79145 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> 
> Am Do, 7. Aug 2025, um 20:55, schrieb Eli Zaretskii:
> >
> > But it was you yourself who claimed that the problem is more general
> > than just the above.  Did you now change your mind?  Or what did I
> > miss?
> 
> Jake's clarification in which he told that especially the advertisement of the doc-view specific key-binding is the actual problem which makes it much worse than the dired example I came up with.
> 
> >> If we'd really like to have an option which says "don't bother me with
> >> messages relating to buffers which are not current (or visible)", then
> >> auto-revert is just one out of several possible causes.  Timers are
> >> another one, e.g., messages from Gnus fetching mail.  Or modes doing
> >> asynchronous communication.  And then one probably wants to be able to
> >> define that certain messages are fine although the corresponding buffer
> >> isn't current/visible ("You have 3 new mails", "The compilation of foo
> >> has finished") but others not...
> >
> > So now you are saying that even solving this for all auto-revert
> > clients is not general enough?
> 
> It looks to me like complexity which only solves half of a problem which was my initial interpretation of the bug report but not what the reporter had in mind. I would not enable such an option if it existed, so I suggest we just ignore my "accidental feature request" and I'll only fix specifically what Jake complained about.

Fine by me, thanks.




This bug report was last modified today.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.