GNU bug report logs - #79084
[PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
Subject: bug#79084: closed (Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order
 in eww-switch-to-buffer)
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 22:33:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
79084: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=79084
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, 79084-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:07 -0400

> The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
> using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
> with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
> giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
> 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?

Indeed.

> And, in that case, why not get rid of the cl- as well?

Fine by me, pushed to `master`, thank you.


        Stefan

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?

[0001-lisp-net-eww-el--eww-switch-to-buffer---Use-norm.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 6 (text/plain, inline)]

And, in that case, why not get rid of the cl- as well?

[0002-Prefer-seq--functions-to-cl--in-eww-switch-to-buff.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 8 (text/plain, inline)]

--

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.