GNU bug report logs - #79084
[PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 79084 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?

[0001-lisp-net-eww-el--eww-switch-to-buffer---Use-norm.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]

And, in that case, why not get rid of the cl- as well?

[0002-Prefer-seq--functions-to-cl--in-eww-switch-to-buff.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

[Message part 5 (text/plain, inline)]

--

Message #8 received at 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr,
 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300

> Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
> Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530
> From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
>  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Severity: wishlist
> Tags: patch
> 
> The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
> using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
> with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
> giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
> 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?

Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have
comments.

Message #11 received at 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jimjoe <at> gmx.net, mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300

Ping!  Would people please respond so we could make progress in this
matter?

> Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr,
>  79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> > Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530
> > From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> >  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> > 
> > Severity: wishlist
> > Tags: patch
> > 
> > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
> > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
> > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
> > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
> > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?
> 
> Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have
> comments.
> 
> 
> 
> 

Message #14 received at 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jimjoe <at> gmx.net, mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:57:38 +0300

Ping! Ping!  Could people please chime in?

> Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Ping!  Would people please respond so we could make progress in this
> matter?
> 
> > Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr,
> >  79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > 
> > > Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530
> > > From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> > >  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> > > 
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Tags: patch
> > > 
> > > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
> > > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
> > > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
> > > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
> > > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?
> > 
> > Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have
> > comments.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Message #17 received at 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jimjoe <at> gmx.net, mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 10:46:45 +0300

Ping! Ping! Ping!  Still waiting for people to respond and help making
progress with this issue.

> Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:57:38 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Ping! Ping!  Could people please chime in?
> 
> > Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > 
> > Ping!  Would people please respond so we could make progress in this
> > matter?
> > 
> > > Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr,
> > >  79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > > Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300
> > > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > > 
> > > > Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
> > > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530
> > > > From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> > > >  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> > > > 
> > > > Severity: wishlist
> > > > Tags: patch
> > > > 
> > > > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
> > > > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
> > > > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
> > > > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
> > > > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?
> > > 
> > > Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have
> > > comments.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Message #22 received at 79084-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
To: James Thomas <jimjoe <at> gmx.net>
Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, 79084-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca,
 manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
Subject: Re: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 13 Sep 2025 18:32:07 -0400

> The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
> using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
> with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
> giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
> 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?

Indeed.

> And, in that case, why not get rid of the cl- as well?

Fine by me, pushed to `master`, thank you.


        Stefan

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.