GNU bug report logs - #79084
[PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: jimjoe <at> gmx.net, mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#79084: [PATCH] Use normal buffer order in eww-switch-to-buffer
Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2025 10:57:38 +0300

Ping! Ping!  Could people please chime in?

> Cc: 79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 13:35:50 +0300
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> Ping!  Would people please respond so we could make progress in this
> matter?
> 
> > Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu, monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca, manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr,
> >  79084 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2025 17:03:10 +0300
> > From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> > 
> > > Cc: mvoteiza <at> udel.edu monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 10:43:07 +0530
> > > From:  James Thomas via "Bug reports for GNU Emacs,
> > >  the Swiss army knife of text editors" <bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org>
> > > 
> > > Severity: wishlist
> > > Tags: patch
> > > 
> > > The original reason for the 'nreverse' seems to have been for cycling
> > > using 's RET s RET...' ala ERC (bug#22244) - that won't, obviously, work
> > > with this put in - but the 'right' way to allow doing that would be by
> > > giving it a more specific 'category' (describe-variable
> > > 'completion-extra-properties), isn't it?
> > 
> > Resending after fixing the CC'ed people, in the hope they will have
> > comments.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 
> 

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.