GNU bug report logs - #78752
31.0.50; New tex-mode prettify-symbols-mode rule causes visual regression

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Tony Zorman <mail <at> tony-zorman.com>

Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 17:39:03 UTC

Severity: normal

Found in version 31.0.50

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>, tsdh <at> gnu.org
Cc: mail <at> tony-zorman.com, 78752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#78752: 31.0.50; New tex-mode prettify-symbols-mode rule causes visual regression
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 15:42:20 +0300
> Cc: 78752 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Tassilo Horn <tsdh <at> gnu.org>
> From: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:24:07 +0200
> 
> Tony Zorman <mail <at> tony-zorman.com> writes:
> 
> >> ef6203b64aaf was my attempt to share the less controversial
> >> prettifications accumulated in my config, but I'm happy to "unshare"
> >> this one (attached patch) if it's causing false positives.
> >
> > I would personally prefer this, but can also obviously adjust my own
> > config if needed
> 
> It's easier for users to add entries than to delete them, so I think
> we're in agreement that the entry should be removed like in my patch.
> 
> > (this change certainly isn't as bad as the long established
> > replacement of showing '\newline' as LINE SEPARATOR, making it
> > essentially invisible by default).
> 
> I guess I haven't run into TeX \newline's often enough to notice this,
> but it's invisible for me, too.  @Tassilo: any thoughts on this one?

The change seems like a no-brainer to me, but let's wait for Tassilo
to chime in.




This bug report was last modified 7 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.