GNU bug report logs - #78753
[PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation commands

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 78753 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: [PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation commands
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2025 20:17:13 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

With this patch and with repeat-mode active, one can navigate by year in
calendar using 'C-x ] ]' rather than 'C-x ] C-x ]', for instance.

[0001-Add-repeat-map-for-calendar-year-navigation-commands.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #8 received at 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78753: [PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation
 commands
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:52:56 +0300

> With this patch and with repeat-mode active, one can navigate by year in
> calendar using 'C-x ] ]' rather than 'C-x ] C-x ]', for instance.

I wanted to suggest the same thing for 'C-x >', but discovered it has
a shorter alternative '>' for the same command 'calendar-scroll-left'.
(I don't remember whether I usually use it or the longer sequence).

Would it be simpler just to add the single key bindings '[' and ']'?
There are currently free in 'calendar-mode-map'.

Message #11 received at 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78753: [PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation
 commands
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:15:33 +0200

Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:

>> With this patch and with repeat-mode active, one can navigate by year in
>> calendar using 'C-x ] ]' rather than 'C-x ] C-x ]', for instance.
>
> I wanted to suggest the same thing for 'C-x >', but discovered it has
> a shorter alternative '>' for the same command 'calendar-scroll-left'.
> (I don't remember whether I usually use it or the longer sequence).
>
> Would it be simpler just to add the single key bindings '[' and ']'?
> There are currently free in 'calendar-mode-map'.

Ah, good thinking.  Yes, and along similar lines, how about binding '{'
and '}' to 'calendar-backward-month' and 'calendar-forward-month'?

Let me know if I can help with this or if it's easier for you just to do
it.

Message #14 received at 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Manuel Giraud <manuel <at> ledu-giraud.fr>
To: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Subject: Re: bug#78753: [PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation
 commands
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 09:38:44 +0200

"Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com> writes:

> With this patch and with repeat-mode active, one can navigate by year in
> calendar using 'C-x ] ]' rather than 'C-x ] C-x ]', for instance.

Thanks.  It works as expected.  I too was thinking about adding the same
feature to 'M-{' and 'M-}'.
-- 
Manuel Giraud

Message #17 received at 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78753: [PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation
 commands
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 19:40:27 +0300

>>> With this patch and with repeat-mode active, one can navigate by year in
>>> calendar using 'C-x ] ]' rather than 'C-x ] C-x ]', for instance.
>>
>> I wanted to suggest the same thing for 'C-x >', but discovered it has
>> a shorter alternative '>' for the same command 'calendar-scroll-left'.
>> (I don't remember whether I usually use it or the longer sequence).
>>
>> Would it be simpler just to add the single key bindings '[' and ']'?
>> There are currently free in 'calendar-mode-map'.
>
> Ah, good thinking.  Yes, and along similar lines, how about binding '{'
> and '}' to 'calendar-backward-month' and 'calendar-forward-month'?

Good idea.

> Let me know if I can help with this or if it's easier for you just to do
> it.

It's not easier for me since it requires also updating the documentation ;-)

Message #20 received at 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
To: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
Cc: 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78753: [PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation
 commands
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2025 20:15:37 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net> writes:

>>>> With this patch and with repeat-mode active, one can navigate by year in
>>>> calendar using 'C-x ] ]' rather than 'C-x ] C-x ]', for instance.
>>>
>>> I wanted to suggest the same thing for 'C-x >', but discovered it has
>>> a shorter alternative '>' for the same command 'calendar-scroll-left'.
>>> (I don't remember whether I usually use it or the longer sequence).
>>>
>>> Would it be simpler just to add the single key bindings '[' and ']'?
>>> There are currently free in 'calendar-mode-map'.
>>
>> Ah, good thinking.  Yes, and along similar lines, how about binding '{'
>> and '}' to 'calendar-backward-month' and 'calendar-forward-month'?
>
> Good idea.
>
>> Let me know if I can help with this or if it's easier for you just to do
>> it.
>
> It's not easier for me since it requires also updating the documentation ;-)

Very well, please see attached.

[0001-Add-simpler-binds-for-calendar-month-year-navigation.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]

Message #23 received at 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
To: "Paul D. Nelson" <ultrono <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 78753 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#78753: [PATCH] Add repeat-map for calendar year navigation
 commands
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 09:33:56 +0300

close 78753 31.0.50
thanks

> Very well, please see attached.

Thanks, pushed.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.