GNU bug report logs - #78383
[PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify date.

Previous Next

To reply to this bug, email your comments to 78383 AT debbugs.gnu.org.
There is no need to reopen the bug first.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Noé Lopez <noelopez <at> free.fr>
To: guix-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: Noé Lopez <noelopez <at> free.fr>
Subject: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify date.
Date: Sun, 11 May 2025 21:31:22 +0200

Truly an off-by-one error of all time.
---
 001-gcd-process.md | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/001-gcd-process.md b/001-gcd-process.md
index 5d1db5a..2c3d187 100644
--- a/001-gcd-process.md
+++ b/001-gcd-process.md
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ status: accepted
 discussion: https://issues.guix.gnu.org/74736
 authors: Simon Tournier, Noé Lopez, Ludovic Courtès
 sponsors: pukkamustard, Ricardo Wurmus
-date: 2025-12-08
+date: 2024-12-08
 SPDX-License-Identifier: CC-BY-SA-4.0 OR GFDL-1.3-no-invariants-or-later
 ---
 
-- 
2.49.0

Message #8 received at 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Rutherther <rutherther <at> ditigal.xyz>
To: 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Noé Lopez <noelopez <at> free.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify
 date.
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 19:44:35 +0200

> Truly an off-by-one error of all time.
> ---

Hi, I think you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to
78382 with the cover letter. :)

Message #13 received at 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Noé Lopez <noelopez <at> free.fr>
To: Rutherther <rutherther <at> ditigal.xyz>, 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH guix-consensus-documents 1/1] 001-gcd-process: Rectify
 date.
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 08:08:07 +0200

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Rutherther <rutherther <at> ditigal.xyz> writes:

>> Truly an off-by-one error of all time.
>> ---
>
> Hi, I think you made an off by one error, and wanted to send this patch to
> 78382 with the cover letter. :)

I just thought the patch was so important it deserved two issue numbers!
:P

Good morning,
Noé

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

Message #16 received at 78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
To: control <at> debbugs.gnu.org,78383 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: QA review for 78383
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 16:20:33 +0200

user guix
usertag 78383 + reviewed-looks-good
thanks

Guix QA review form submission:
Hi Noé, 
Thanks for this correction, LGTM.
Nicolas

No checks recorded.

-- 
Best regards,
Nicolas Graves

Message #19 received at 78383-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
To: Nicolas Graves <ngraves <at> ngraves.fr>
Cc: 78383-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 78382-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: QA review for 78383
Date: Mon, 26 May 2025 11:54:00 +0200

Applied, thanks!

Andreas

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.