GNU bug report logs - #77566
[PATCH] Add option for automatically delete non-existent projects.

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>

Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2025 23:52:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Tags: patch

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
To: Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev>
Cc: 77566 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Sean Whitton <spwhitton <at> spwhitton.name>
Subject: bug#77566: [PATCH] Add option for automatically delete non-existent projects.
Date: Wed, 09 Apr 2025 22:07:45 -0600
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev> writes:

> On 09/04/2025 22:28, Elijah Gabe Pérez wrote:
>> Dmitry Gutov <dmitry <at> gutov.dev> writes:
>> 
>>> On 09/04/2025 07:23, Elijah Gabe Pérez wrote:
>>>> Instead what about purge it once after emacs startup?
>>>
>>> I think a concern was voiced that during a long-running session directories can get removed at any time.
>>>
>>> +        (project-forget-zombie-projects nil t))))
>>>
>>> Are we sure that we want to suppress the messages about the removals in this case? Personally, I'd just print it in any case (if some were removed anyway).
>> It would display the message after `startup-echo-area-message'.
>> I think it would be intrusive.
>
> Do we read the project list at startup?

Apparently no, I didn't notice it's just my configuration
that does it.

>> I've changed it to `inhibit-message' instead, which will include
>> the message into *Messages* buffer but will not be displayed.
>
> That's fine too, although we probably do want to show it when called interactively.

Sure.  I've added it as an user option.

>>> +(defun project-forget-zombie-projects (&optional no-remote no-message)
>>>> +  "Forget all known projects that don't exist any more.
>>>> +If NO-REMOTE is non-nil, don't forget remote projects.
>>>
>>> Maybe NO-REMOTE should be called INCLUDE-REMOTE instead?
>>>
>>> Right now it sounds like the opposite of its actual meaning.
>> I think EXCLUDE-REMOTES would be a better name,
>> the INCLUDE-REMOTE name would give the impression that it does not
>> delete remote projects by default.  `project-forget-zombie-projects' by
>> default includes remote and no remote projects.
>
> Don't we want to avoid remote projects by default? It might take a long time. Does it here in my testing anyway.
>
> Having the "fast" path to be the default and the "thorough" as the prefix command alternative seems to be a common approach.

You are right, I've change it for exclude remote projects by default.

[0001-Add-option-for-automatically-delete-non-existent-pro.patch (text/x-patch, attachment)]
[Message part 3 (text/plain, inline)]
-- 
                                          - E.G via GNU Emacs and Org.

This bug report was last modified 66 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.