GNU bug report logs -
#77549
ELPA: Duplicate entries for GNU Poke?
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
Yes, but is that an issue for you?
On 10 April 2025 10:44:57 CEST, "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch <at> gnu.org> wrote:
>
>> "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>>>> "Jose E. Marchesi" <jemarch <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>>>
>>>>>> [[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
>>>>>> [[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
>>>>>> [[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > poke.el is an Emacs interface for poke.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > poke-mode.el is a mode to edit programs written in Poke, the programming
>>>>>> > language implemented by poke.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It makes sense now that you've explained it, but the simiarity will
>>>>>> surely cause confusion. Can we adjust the names to make the
>>>>>> difference clear? Of course, both names should mention Poke.
>>>>>> but they can differ more.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Perhaps the interface to Poke should be called poke-interface or
>>>>>> subpoke.
>>>>>
>>>>> What about renaming poke-mode.el to poke-lang-mode.el?
>>>>
>>>> I have to admit that "-lang-mode" sounds off. Is there a reason you
>>>> don't bundle poke-mode.el with the poke package?
>>>
>>> poke-mode.el is useful even if you don't use the Emacs interface to
>>> poke.
>>
>> But that is not inherently a reason to package both features in the same
>> package. The user gets both the Poke interface and poke-mode in the
>> same package, but they don't have to use everything.
>
>That would require a multi-file package?
>
>
>>> I myself use the poke CLI primarily, and still use poke-mode.el all the
>>> time to write my .pk files.
>>>
>>> Then, what about to rename poke.el into something else. Suggestions?
Sent from my phone
This bug report was last modified 67 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.