GNU bug report logs - #77224
[PATCH] New minor mode 'cursor-indicators-mode'

Previous Next

Full log

Message #65 received at 77224 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
Cc: mail <at> daniel-mendler.de, juri <at> linkov.net, 77224 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#77224: [PATCH] New minor mode 'cursor-indicators-mode'
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 18:02:36 +0200

> From: Elijah Gabe Pérez <eg642616 <at> gmail.com>
> Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2025 08:53:25 -0600
> Cc: mail <at> daniel-mendler.de, 77224 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, 
> 	Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
> 
> Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
> 
>  Btw, a possibly even better way is to modify the cursor looks from the
>  hooks of the relevant commands, like overwrite-mode.  If some of them
>  don't have a hook, we could add a hook.  This is better because it
>  doesn't unnecessarily "punish" Emacs anywhere else, only the commands
>  that could affect the cursor.
> 
> But what if user prefer using a lambda instead a function? For example for a specific mode or action from a
> key binding package such as evil or meow

Sorry, I don't understand: what lambda?  Aren't all the modes you want
to catch normal minor modes with a hook?

> also i don't know if buffer-read-only have a proper hook.

read-only-mode does have a hook.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.