GNU bug report logs - #77224
[PATCH] New minor mode 'cursor-indicators-mode'

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: Visuwesh <visuweshm <at> gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
Cc: Daniel Mendler <mail <at> daniel-mendler.de>, eg642616 <at> gmail.com, juri <at> linkov.net, 77224 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#77224: [PATCH] New minor mode 'cursor-indicators-mode'
Date: Sat, 29 Mar 2025 08:23:13 +0530

[வெள்ளி மார்ச் 28, 2025] Eli Zaretskii wrote:

> How long is the post-command-hook list in your production sessions?
> Should we poll users to give their data?  Just yesterday someone
> complained on Reddit that Emacs is too slow, and I have no doubt that
> features that use post-command-hook are at least part of the reason if
> not _the_ reason.

CAVEAT: I am aware of the ill effects of having too many things in
post-command-hook and generally avoid it unless strictly necessary.

In the message-mode buffer I'm writing this from:

(t flyspell-post-command-hook)

In Org mode:

(prettify-symbols--post-command-hook t)

In f90-mode:

(jit-lock--antiblink-post-command eldoc-schedule-timer t)

In elisp-mode:

(jit-lock--antiblink-post-command eldoc-schedule-timer
reveal-post-command t)

Global value:

(transient--post-command-hook repeat-post-hook)

I have no idea why transient--post-command-hook is in there.  I don't
use transient at all.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.