GNU bug report logs - #76953
Latest elpa track-changes 1.3 uses incf which does not exist in Emacs < 31

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
Subject: bug#76953: closed (Re: bug#76953: Latest elpa track-changes 1.3
 uses incf which does not exist in Emacs < 31)
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 00:19:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your bug report

#76953: Latest elpa track-changes 1.3 uses incf which does not exist in Emacs < 31

which was filed against the emacs package, has been closed.

The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 76953 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.

-- 
76953: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=76953
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>, 76953-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Cc: Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: bug#76953: Latest elpa track-changes 1.3 uses incf which does not
 exist in Emacs < 31
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 17:18:25 -0700

Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Second package released a couple of days that refers to future features.
>
> track-changes says:
>
> ;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24"))
>
> Is there an ELPA infrastructure testing regime, across at least a couple of
> supported Emacs releases, that these packages should be passing?  I guess,
> like my little ELPA package, it's author's honor.

Thanks for the bug report.

This should now be fixed, and I've bumped the version of track-changes
accordingly, so it should be released on GNU ELPA within 24 hours.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Ship Mints <shipmints <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Latest elpa track-changes 1.3 uses incf which does not exist in Emacs
 < 31
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:53:29 -0400

[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]

Second package released a couple of days that refers to future features.

track-changes says:

;; Package-Requires: ((emacs "24"))

Is there an ELPA infrastructure testing regime, across at least a couple of
supported Emacs releases, that these packages should be passing?  I guess,
like my little ELPA package, it's author's honor.

-Stephane

[Message part 5 (text/html, inline)]

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.