GNU bug report logs -
#76945
[PATCH] etags: character classes and intervals not working in --regex
Previous Next
Full log
Message #20 received at 76945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
Ping! Can we make some progress in resolving this?
Richard, do you have any comments?
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 10:58:58 -0700
> Cc: 76945 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Richard Stallman <rms <at> gnu.org>,
> Vladimir Gorsunov <gorsunov <at> gmail.com>
> From: Paul Eggert <eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu>
>
> On 2025-03-11 10:41, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> >> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 14:28:45 +0200
> >> From: Vladimir Gorsunov <gorsunov <at> gmail.com>
> >>
> >> Before commit d904cc83 regex syntax flags used in etags were
> >>
> >> RE_CHAR_CLASSES | RE_INTERVALS | RE_SHY_GROUPS | RE_FRUGAL
> >>
> >> that got changed to 0. Including a patch that restores
> >> RE_CHAR_CLASSES and RE_INTERVALS and adds check for these features
> >> to the test. As far I can understand from the bug 74861, the
> >> absence of shy groups and non-greedy matching won't be fixed
> >> until Gnulib supports them
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > Paul, any comments?
>
> As I understand it the original design for glibc regex was that Emacs
> was the default, so a flags value of zero meant Emacs. This is why
> RE_SYNTAX_EMACS is 0.
>
> Evidently that design goal no longer holds, so it makes sense to adjust
> Emacs's use of glibc flags to match the behavior of Emacs's only
> regular-expression implementation in emacs/src/regex-emacs.c as best we can.
>
> However, surely this adjustment should be made in Gnulib, not in
> etags.c. That is, gnulib/lib/regex.h (aka emacs/lib/regex.h) should
> #define RE_SYNTAX_EMACS to equal RE_CHAR_CLASSES | RE_INTERVALS, not
> zero. And eventually this change should be migrated back to glibc.
>
> I'll cc this to rms in case he has further comments about this.
>
This bug report was last modified 31 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.