GNU bug report logs -
#76812
vestigial elisp manual descriptions of obsolete variables mouse-wheel-up/down-event
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
> On Mar 7, 2025, at 12:22 PM, Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca <mailto:monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>> writes:
>
>>>> The following paragraph in the elisp manual section "Miscellaneous System
>>>> Events" describes blinding events based on the now obsolete variables
>>>> `mouse-wheel-down-event', etc.:
>>>>
>>>>> The ‘wheel-up’ and ‘wheel-down’ events are generated only on some
>>>>> kinds of systems. On other systems, other events like ‘mouse-4’
>>>>> and ‘mouse-5’ are used instead. Portable code should handle both
>>>>> ‘wheel-up’ and ‘wheel-down’ events as well as the events specified
>>>>> in the variables ‘mouse-wheel-up-event’ and
>>>>> ‘mouse-wheel-down-event’, defined in ‘mwheel.el’. Beware that for
>>>>> historical reasons the ‘mouse-wheel-_up_-event’ is the variable
>>>>> that holds an event that should be handled similarly to
>>>>> ‘wheel-_down_’ and vice versa.
>>>
>>> Stefan, WDYT?
>>
>> To the extent that there are still cases where mouse-4/5 is used,
>> I guess we can keep that almost unchanged, except to adjust the wording
>> to indicate what is more normal. E.g.:
>>
>> The ‘wheel-up’ and ‘wheel-down’ events are generated on most systems.
>> But in some unusual configurations, other events like ‘mouse-4’
>> and ‘mouse-5’ may still be used instead. Portable code that wants
>> to accommodate those cases should handle both
>> ‘wheel-up’ and ‘wheel-down’ events as well as the events specified
>> in the variables ‘mouse-wheel-up-event’ and
>> ‘mouse-wheel-down-event’, defined in ‘mwheel.el’. Beware that for
>> historical reasons the ‘mouse-wheel-_up_-event’ is the variable
>> that holds an event that should be handled similarly to
>> ‘wheel-_down_’ and vice versa.
>>
>> ?
>
> Would it make sense we say something about what those "unusual
> configurations" are?
I think so. The current situation is sort of odd, in that the variables are both obsoleted (conveying: do not use in new code), and also apparently required for use in new portable code. Does that suggest they were obsoleted prematurely, if they are still required on some systems?
[Message part 2 (text/html, inline)]
This bug report was last modified 97 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.