GNU bug report logs - #7660
Bug#607048: wad of trailing blanks added after every expansion

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: jidanni <at> jidanni.org

Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:44:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 7660 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 7660 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#7660; Package emacs. (Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to jidanni <at> jidanni.org:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org. (Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:44:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
To: barak <at> cs.nuim.ie, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Cc: bbdb-info <at> lists.sourceforge.net, 607048 <at> bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#607048: wad of trailing blanks added after every expansion
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:50:01 +0800

I can now confirm the problem is not in
bbdb:
  Installed: 2.36-2
But instead is due to something they changed between these two versions:
emacs-snapshot:
  Installed: 1:20101204-1
  Candidate: 1:20101212-2

I cannot reassign this bug from debian.org to gnu.org so I'll let others
take care of it...

>>>>> "BAP" == Barak A Pearlmutter <barak <at> cs.nuim.ie> writes:
BAP> Well, technically speaking emacs-snapshot isn't a Debian package.
BAP> Does this still come up with the usual Debian emacs23 package?
BAP> It is not replicating for me...
Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org:
bug#7660; Package emacs. (Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:24:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 7660 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: jidanni <at> jidanni.org
To: monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca
Cc: 7660 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: BBDB vs emacs-snapshot
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 08:28:44 +0800

Stefan,
>>>>> "RF" == Romain Francoise <romain <at> orebokech.com> writes:
RF> "Barak A. Pearlmutter" <barak <at> cs.nuim.ie> writes:

>> Apparently something changed between emacs-snapshot
>> 1:20101204-1 and 1:20101212-2 which either caused or
>> tickled a bug when using BDBB.  See Debian BTS #607048
>> for details.

RF> Yes, from a cursory look it's caused by this commit:

RF>    http://git.gnus.org/cgit/gnus.git/commit/?id=9464be87c0

RF> After this change, `message-tab' does the completion *and* inserts a
RF> TAB, which is probably not what was intended. There's a report in
RF> the Emacs bug tracker now (#7660), so feel free to point Stefan to it.
bug closed, send any further explanations to jidanni <at> jidanni.org Request was from Glenn Morris <rgm <at> gnu.org> to control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 24 Feb 2011 02:41:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Thu, 24 Mar 2011 11:24:05 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 91 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.