GNU bug report logs - #76596
30.1; dired-movement-style does not honor subdir operations

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Charles Choi <kickingvegas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:07:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 30.1

Fixed in version 30.1.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: juri <at> linkov.net
Cc: kickingvegas <at> gmail.com, 76596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#76596: 30.1; dired-movement-style does not honor subdir operations
Date: Sun, 09 Mar 2025 12:02:16 +0200
Ping! Juri, could you please answer my question below?

> Cc: kickingvegas <at> gmail.com, 76596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 16:57:49 +0200
> From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
> 
> > From: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>
> > Cc: kickingvegas <at> gmail.com,  76596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
> > Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 09:12:58 +0200
> > 
> > >> I'm not sure what is the behavior expected by most users?
> > >> It seems the intention for this feature was to visit only
> > >> filename lines with n, p, C-p, C-n,
> > >
> > > I initially thought about that, but (a) the documentation says
> > > something else, and (b) the original implementation, before your
> > > changes mentioned above, indeed skipped only empty lines, not any
> > > lines that don't show a file name.  So I changed my mind about that.
> > 
> > Maybe this preference should be defined by the option?
> > Or by a new value of the existing option?
> 
> Yes, additional value(s) of the option would be good if we want to
> have both behaviors.
> 
> Are you okay with me installing my patch, and then you working on
> adding the new value(s)?
> 
> 
> 
> 




This bug report was last modified 58 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.