GNU bug report logs - #76596
30.1; dired-movement-style does not honor subdir operations

Previous Next

Package: emacs;

Reported by: Charles Choi <kickingvegas <at> gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 20:07:01 UTC

Severity: minor

Found in version 30.1

Fixed in version 30.1.50

Done: Juri Linkov <juri <at> linkov.net>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org>
To: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
Cc: kickingvegas <at> gmail.com, 76596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, juri <at> linkov.net
Subject: bug#76596: 30.1; dired-movement-style does not honor subdir operations
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 21:49:33 +0200
> From: Drew Adams <drew.adams <at> oracle.com>
> CC: "76596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org" <76596 <at> debbugs.gnu.org>,
>         Juri Linkov
> 	<juri <at> linkov.net>
> Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 19:38:02 +0000
> 
> > It is not clear to me the value of having an option to prevent navigating
> > to subdirs to reproduce the behavior shipped in 30.1. Why enforce two
> > separate commands of navigation based on type? To me, subdir navigation is
> > a subset of line navigation where line navigation moves the point to any
> > non-blank line, and subdir navigation only applies to subdirs.
> > 
> > If it is insisted that enforcing separate commands for type navigation
> > (file/directory, subdir) be supported, then please do _not_ make this
> > option the default for dired-movement-style. I still consider such an
> > option to be a user interface mistake.
> 
> +1, for not preventing navigation to subdirs.
> 
> I even see no particular value in skipping
> blank lines!

This is all a tempest in a teapot.  We are discussing opt-in behavior,
so it should only matter to people who'd want to opt in.  People who
don't like these optional behaviors should not bother.




This bug report was last modified 58 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.