GNU bug report logs - #7654
docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual?

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:35:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the
	automake manual?
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:40:37 +0100

The subjects says it all, basically.

In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:

 ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
   ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
   ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
   control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''

Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too?  Or am I missing
something?

Regards,
  Stefano
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 156 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.