GNU bug report logs - #7654
docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual?

Previous Next

Package: automake;

Reported by: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>

Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:35:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 7654 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 7654 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox


Report forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#7654; Package automake. (Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:35:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Acknowledgement sent to Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-automake <at> gnu.org. (Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:35:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-automake <at> gnu.org
Subject: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the
	automake manual?
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:40:37 +0100
The subjects says it all, basically.

In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:

 ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
   ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
   ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
   control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''

Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too?  Or am I missing
something?

Regards,
  Stefano




Information forwarded to owner <at> debbugs.gnu.org, bug-automake <at> gnu.org:
bug#7654; Package automake. (Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:05:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 7654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de>
To: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 7654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of
	primaries in the automake manual?
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:11:02 +0100
* Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET:
> In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:
> 
>  ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
>    ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
>    ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
>    control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''
> 
> Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too?

Yes.  The obvious patch is preapproved.

Thanks,
Ralf




Reply sent to Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>:
You have taken responsibility. (Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:49:01 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Notification sent to Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:49:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 7654-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
To: Ralf Wildenhues <Ralf.Wildenhues <at> gmx.de>,
 automake-patches <at> gnu.org
Cc: 7654-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries
	in the automake manual?
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:54:21 +0100
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET:
> > In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:
> > 
> >  ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
> >    ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
> >    ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
> >    control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''
> > 
> > Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too?
> 
> Yes.  The obvious patch is preapproved.
> 
> Thanks,
> Ralf
> 

This is what I pushed to maint.

Regards,
   Stefano

-*-*-*-

docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries

* doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among
the Automake primaries.
---
 ChangeLog         |    6 ++++++
 doc/automake.texi |    6 ++++--
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 2482ef1..3eee3a7 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2010-12-16  Stefano Lattarini  <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
+
+	docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries
+	* doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among
+	the Automake primaries.
+
 2010-12-14  Stefano Lattarini  <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
 
 	Improve tests on generated portions of configure help screen.
diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi
index 5a805b3..227b1ba 100644
--- a/doc/automake.texi
+++ b/doc/automake.texi
@@ -2024,10 +2024,12 @@ should not be built until the @samp{make check} command is run.  Those
 objects are not installed either.
 
 The current primary names are @samp{PROGRAMS}, @samp{LIBRARIES},
-@samp{LISP}, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA}, @samp{SCRIPTS}, @samp{DATA},
-@samp{HEADERS}, @samp{MANS}, and @samp{TEXINFOS}.
+@samp{LTLIBRARIES}, @samp{LISP}, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA},
+@samp{SCRIPTS}, @samp{DATA}, @samp{HEADERS}, @samp{MANS}, and
+@samp{TEXINFOS}.
 @vindex PROGRAMS
 @vindex LIBRARIES
+@vindex LTLIBRARIES
 @vindex LISP
 @vindex PYTHON
 @vindex JAVA
-- 
1.7.1




bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Fri, 14 Jan 2011 12:24:04 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

This bug report was last modified 14 years and 155 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.