GNU bug report logs -
#7654
docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual?
Previous Next
Full log
View this message in rfc822 format
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your bug report
#7654: docs: is LTLIBRARIES missing from the list of primaries in the automake manual?
which was filed against the automake package, has been closed.
The explanation is attached below, along with your original report.
If you require more details, please reply to 7654 <at> debbugs.gnu.org.
--
7654: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=7654
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
On Thursday 16 December 2010, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Stefano Lattarini wrote on Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 06:40:37PM CET:
> > In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:
> >
> > ``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
> > ‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
> > ‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
> > control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''
> >
> > Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too?
>
> Yes. The obvious patch is preapproved.
>
> Thanks,
> Ralf
>
This is what I pushed to maint.
Regards,
Stefano
-*-*-*-
docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries
* doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among
the Automake primaries.
---
ChangeLog | 6 ++++++
doc/automake.texi | 6 ++++--
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
index 2482ef1..3eee3a7 100644
--- a/ChangeLog
+++ b/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2010-12-16 Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
+
+ docs: list LTLIBRARIES among Automake primaries
+ * doc/automake.texi (Uniform): List `LTLIBRARIES' among
+ the Automake primaries.
+
2010-12-14 Stefano Lattarini <stefano.lattarini <at> gmail.com>
Improve tests on generated portions of configure help screen.
diff --git a/doc/automake.texi b/doc/automake.texi
index 5a805b3..227b1ba 100644
--- a/doc/automake.texi
+++ b/doc/automake.texi
@@ -2024,10 +2024,12 @@ should not be built until the @samp{make check} command is run. Those
objects are not installed either.
The current primary names are @samp{PROGRAMS}, @samp{LIBRARIES},
-@samp{LISP}, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA}, @samp{SCRIPTS}, @samp{DATA},
-@samp{HEADERS}, @samp{MANS}, and @samp{TEXINFOS}.
+@samp{LTLIBRARIES}, @samp{LISP}, @samp{PYTHON}, @samp{JAVA},
+@samp{SCRIPTS}, @samp{DATA}, @samp{HEADERS}, @samp{MANS}, and
+@samp{TEXINFOS}.
@vindex PROGRAMS
@vindex LIBRARIES
+@vindex LTLIBRARIES
@vindex LISP
@vindex PYTHON
@vindex JAVA
--
1.7.1
[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
The subjects says it all, basically.
In section "3.3 The Uniform Naming Scheme" I read:
``The current primary names are ‘PROGRAMS’, ‘LIBRARIES’, ‘LISP’,
‘PYTHON’, ‘JAVA’, ‘SCRIPTS’, ‘DATA’, ‘HEADERS’, ‘MANS’, and
‘TEXINFOS’. Some primaries also allow additional prefixes that
control other aspects of automake's behavior. ...''
Shouldn't `LTLIBRARIES' be listed here too? Or am I missing
something?
Regards,
Stefano
This bug report was last modified 14 years and 156 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.