GNU bug report logs - #76312
go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:05:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

Full log


View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#76312: closed (go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is
 invalid")
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2025 01:07:02 +0000
[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Your message dated Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:06:43 -0500
with message-id <Z7E6I36bXowpGiVJ <at> jasmine.lan>
and subject line Re: bug#76312: go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #76312,
regarding go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
76312: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=76312
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems
[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
Subject: go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:04:06 -0500
Hi Sharlatan,

I noticed that `guix lint` complains about the description of go-ulid:

------
$ guix lint go-ulid
gnu/packages/golang-xyz.scm:17707:5: go-ulid <at> 2.1.0: Texinfo markup in description is invalid
------

I'm not sure, but it could be the leading white-space in the
description. Are you able to take a look and see if there is any room for
improvement?


[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]
From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 76312-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#76312: go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:06:43 -0500
[Message part 4 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 09:48:29PM +0000, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> I've fixed it in aadee4a58ddb4c0995c41dc4c0d16464665c54c1.
> 
> Feel free to double check and/or close this issue.

Thanks for the fix! Closing...
[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]

This bug report was last modified 94 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.