GNU bug report logs - #76312
go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"

Previous Next

Package: guix;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:05:01 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Bug is archived. No further changes may be made.

To add a comment to this bug, you must first unarchive it, by sending
a message to control AT debbugs.gnu.org, with unarchive 76312 in the body.
You can then email your comments to 76312 AT debbugs.gnu.org in the normal way.

Toggle the display of automated, internal messages from the tracker.

View this report as an mbox folder, status mbox, maintainer mbox

Report forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#76312; Package guix. (Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:05:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Acknowledgement sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
New bug report received and forwarded. Copy sent to bug-guix <at> gnu.org. (Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:05:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #5 received at submit <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: bug-guix <at> gnu.org
Cc: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
Subject: go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 15:04:06 -0500

Hi Sharlatan,

I noticed that `guix lint` complains about the description of go-ulid:

------
$ guix lint go-ulid
gnu/packages/golang-xyz.scm:17707:5: go-ulid <at> 2.1.0: Texinfo markup in description is invalid
------

I'm not sure, but it could be the leading white-space in the
description. Are you able to take a look and see if there is any room for
improvement?
Information forwarded to bug-guix <at> gnu.org:
bug#76312; Package guix. (Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:49:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #8 received at 76312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
To: 76312 <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 21:48:29 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
Hi,

Nice catch!

I've fixed it in aadee4a58ddb4c0995c41dc4c0d16464665c54c1.

Feel free to double check and/or close this issue.

--
Oleg

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
Reply sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
You have taken responsibility. (Sun, 16 Feb 2025 01:07:02 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
Notification sent to Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>:
bug acknowledged by developer. (Sun, 16 Feb 2025 01:07:03 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.

Message #13 received at 76312-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Sharlatan Hellseher <sharlatanus <at> gmail.com>
Cc: 76312-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: Re: bug#76312: go-ulid "Texinfo markup in description is invalid"
Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:06:43 -0500

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]
On Sat, Feb 15, 2025 at 09:48:29PM +0000, Sharlatan Hellseher wrote:
> I've fixed it in aadee4a58ddb4c0995c41dc4c0d16464665c54c1.
> 
> Feel free to double check and/or close this issue.

Thanks for the fix! Closing...

[signature.asc (application/pgp-signature, inline)]
bug archived. Request was from Debbugs Internal Request <help-debbugs <at> gnu.org> to internal_control <at> debbugs.gnu.org. (Sun, 16 Mar 2025 11:24:08 GMT) Full text and rfc822 format available.
This bug report was last modified 94 days ago.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.