GNU bug report logs - #76311
Request for merging "kernel-team" branch

Previous Next

Package: guix-patches;

Reported by: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>

Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2025 20:01:02 UTC

Severity: normal

Done: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>

Full log


Message #64 received at 76311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):

From: Leo Famulari <leo <at> famulari.name>
To: Andreas Enge <andreas <at> enge.fr>
Cc: 76311 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Christopher Baines <mail <at> cbaines.net>
Subject: Re: Request for merging "kernel-team" branch
Date: Tue, 13 May 2025 11:04:41 -0400
On Tue, May 13, 2025 at 03:43:53PM +0200, Andreas Enge wrote:
> the branch has been almost built, and I did not see major problems
> anymore. Adding an ungrafting commit would restart the whole process
> from scratch again. So at this point in time, I think it would be
> preferable to push the branch to master, and then maybe do a separate
> ungrafting round. The total build effort would now be the same, and it
> would give the other teams a chance to get their changes in.
> 
> What do you think?

Is the next branch (core-packages-team?) ready?

The graft that we would remove is eudev, and it would trigger 5252
builds per architecture. For ci.guix.gnu.org, that is not very much. I
can't estimate how long it would take for QA. If it would take 2 or 3
days, I would say that it's worth it.

As there is not an ungrafting team or branch, I'm skeptical that we
would remove these grafts anytime soon, and I think there is some
benefit to removing them. Applying the grafts on everybody's machines
all the time incurs a real cost in terms of storage, power consumption,
and time.




This bug report was last modified 27 days ago.

Previous Next


GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.