GNU bug report logs - #76194
Obsoleting package-x.el

Previous Next

Full log

View this message in rfc822 format

From: help-debbugs <at> gnu.org (GNU bug Tracking System)
To: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
Cc: tracker <at> debbugs.gnu.org
Subject: bug#76194: closed (Obsoleting package-x.el)
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 16:50:02 +0000

[Message part 1 (text/plain, inline)]

Your message dated Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:49:08 -0800
with message-id <CADwFkmmaSz446VTavm2qgr__V0wL_MSkYk4=Zk+sjX2PQzuCVg <at> mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: bug#76194: Obsoleting package-x.el
has caused the debbugs.gnu.org bug report #76194,
regarding Obsoleting package-x.el
to be marked as done.

(If you believe you have received this mail in error, please contact
help-debbugs <at> gnu.org.)


-- 
76194: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=76194
GNU Bug Tracking System
Contact help-debbugs <at> gnu.org with problems

[Message part 2 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: bug-gnu-emacs <at> gnu.org
Subject: Obsoleting package-x.el
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2025 22:10:55 -0800

Severity: wishlist

I think we should obsolete package-x.el, which contains largely
unmaintained code to keep an ELPA package archive.  This is undocumented
since 2019, lacking (e.g. doesn't support signed packages), and is
hardly used by anyone.  For example, MELPA and GNU ELPA have their own
scripts for this.

If there is any interest in it, I'd suggest that interested parties
should pick it up and continue its development on GNU ELPA instead.

[Message part 3 (message/rfc822, inline)]

From: Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com>
To: Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net>
Cc: 76194-done <at> debbugs.gnu.org, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
Subject: Re: bug#76194: Obsoleting package-x.el
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 08:49:08 -0800

Version: 31.1

Stefan Kangas <stefankangas <at> gmail.com> writes:

> Philip Kaludercic <philipk <at> posteo.net> writes:
>
>> Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
>>
>>>> I think we should obsolete package-x.el, which contains largely
>>>> unmaintained code to keep an ELPA package archive.  This is undocumented
>>>> since 2019, lacking (e.g. doesn't support signed packages), and is
>>>> hardly used by anyone.  For example, MELPA and GNU ELPA have their own
>>>> scripts for this.
>>>>
>>>> If there is any interest in it, I'd suggest that interested parties
>>>> should pick it up and continue its development on GNU ELPA instead.
>>>
>>> +1
>>
>> +1 from me as well.
>
> Thanks.

Now done.  See commits f7867e68565 and 5d4927192a2.

I'm consequently closing this bug report.

>> Should we move the file to elpa.git?
>
> If you think it's worth the effort then feel free.

Please go ahead with this if you think that it's appropriate.

Previous Next

GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham, 1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd, 1994-97 Ian Jackson.