GNU bug report logs -
#75964
Switching the Emacs build to -Wswitch-enum in src/
Previous Next
Full log
Message #101 received at 75964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org (full text, mbox):
"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>> Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2025 12:50:15 +0000
>> From: Pip Cet <pipcet <at> protonmail.com>
>> Cc: eggert <at> cs.ucla.edu, 75964 <at> debbugs.gnu.org, stefankangas <at> gmail.com, Andrea Corallo <acorallo <at> gnu.org>, Stefan Monnier <monnier <at> iro.umontreal.ca>
>>
>> "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:
>>
>> > We (should) use emacs_abort when the code has no way of dealing with
>> > some situation, so letting the execution continue past that point will
>> > sometimes crash or corrupt data in ways that are much harder to debug
>> > than an abort.
>>
>> We often use eassert for that, and I don't know how many people realize
>> this subtle difference between emacs_abort () and eassert (0).
>
> Well, I do: eassert compiles to nothing in a production build, so it
> is only okay if the code can do something with the situation, albeit
> something that will cause weird effects. eassert is also appropriate
> to convey the assumptions made by the code, even if no trouble will be
> caused by violating those assumptions.
Interesting. I often use eassert where the only thing we can do in a
production build is almost certainly a crash. Can you say more about
cases in which it's used to avoid crashes?
>> I still think eassume and eassert shouldn't evaluate expressions with
>> side effects.
>
> I agree. Do we have code which does that in Emacs?
I'm aware of
eassert (check_comp_unit_relocs (comp_u));
in comp.c, which does call an extra function, which might in theory have
side effects because dynlib_sym or Flength or, God forbid, Fgethash may
develop some. But, really, this is a special case and a very minor
issue.
Pip
This bug report was last modified 127 days ago.
Previous Next
GNU bug tracking system
Copyright (C) 1999 Darren O. Benham,
1997,2003 nCipher Corporation Ltd,
1994-97 Ian Jackson.